Fig. 6.

Performances of the three linear α-DAWG models and ImaGene applied to the Constant_1, Constant_2, CEU_1, and CEU_2 test datasets of hard sweeps from de novo mutations (see Performance on hard sweeps from de novo mutations) using the linear α-DAWG models and ImaGene trained as in Figs. 2 and 4. The top panel depicts the percentage of 1,000 hard sweep from de novo mutation test replicates classified as a sweep or neutrality, whereas the bottom panel shows true positive rate at a 5% false positive rate (FPR) to detect such sweeps. Cells within confusion matrices at the top with darker shades of gray indicate that classes in associated columns are predicted at higher percentages.