Skip to main content
. 2024 May 15;11(6):3488–3500. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14832

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

Study Device Access Country Patients (n) Age (years ± SD/IQR) Male (n, %) LES I (%) LES II (%) STS (%) Definition Inclusion criteria
Vahl et al. (2021) JenaValve Transfemoral The United States 71 74 NA NA NA NA VARC‐2 Symptomatic patients with greater‐than‐moderate AR with high surgical risk
Gogia et al. (2020) JenaValve Transfemoral The United States 11 77.6 NA NA NA NA NA Pure severe AR with high surgical risk
Silaschi et al. (2018) JenaValve Transfemoral Germany 30 74.4 ± 9.3 12 (40) 17.7 ± 14.8 6.9 ± 6.5 4.9 ± 3.5 VARC‐1 Severe AR with high surgical risk
Seiffert et al. (2014) JenaValve Transapical Germany 31 73.8 ± 9.1 20 (64.5) 23.6 ± 14.5 9.3 ± 6.4 5.4 ± 3.6 VARC‐2 Severe AR with high surgical risk
Schlingloff et al. (2014) JenaValve Transapical Germany 10 79 ± 9 6 28.3 ± 17.1 NA NA VARC‐2 Severe AR with high or prohibitive surgical risk
Liu et al. (2022) J‐Valve Transapical China 161 NA NA NA NA NA NA Symptomatic severe AR with high surgical risk
Liu et al. (2022) J‐Valve Transapical China 134 73.1 ± 6.4 100 NA 11.5 ± 6.8 9.8 ± 5.3 VARC‐2 Severe AR with high surgical risk
Kong et al. (2022) J‐Valve Transapical China 69 71.46 ± 7.92 52 (75.4) NA NA 3.76 ± 3.93 VARC‐2 Moderate‐to‐severe AR with high surgical risk
Shi et al. (2021) J‐Valve Transapical China 44 76.2 ± 5.5 30 (68.2) 25.3 ± 8.5 NA NA VARC‐2 Severe AR with high surgical risk
Shen et al. (2020) J‐Valve Transapical China 123 72.1 ± 6.4 NA NA NA NA VARC‐2 Pure non‐calcified native AR with high surgical risk
Zhu et al. (2018) J‐Valve Transapical China 44 73.8 ± 5.6 13 25.4 ± 5.3 NA 9.1 ± 3.6 NA Severe AR with high surgical risk and an annulus diameter within the 19–27 mm range
Tung et al. (2018) J‐Valve Transapical China 43 73.8 ± 5.7 30 (69.8) 25.3 ± 5.3 NA NA VARC‐2 Severe AR with high surgical risk
Guo et al. (2018) J‐Valve Transapical China 58 72.3 ± 5.7 39 20.1 ± 3.3 NA NA VARC‐2 Severe pure AR with high surgical risk
Zhu et al. (2016) J‐Valve Transapical China 33 74.2 ± 5.2 26 24.4 ± 5.1 NA NA VARC‐2 Severe pure AR with high surgical risk
Zhu et al. (2016) J‐Valve Transapical China 28 74.1 ± 4.6 NA 23.2 ± 3.3 NA NA VARC‐2 Severe pure AR with high surgical risk
Zhu et al. (2015) J‐Valve Transapical China 11 74.5 ± 4.7 NA NA NA NA NA Severe pure/dominant AR with high surgical risk
Guo et al. (2015) J‐Valve Transapical China 18 73.8 ± 3.7 NA 24.1 ± 4.5 NA NA NA Severe pure AR with high surgical risk
Liu et al. (2018) J‐Valve Transapical China 43 73.9 ± 5.7 30 (69.8) 25.5 ± 5.3 NA NA VARC‐2 Severe pure AR with high surgical risk
Liu et al. (2019) J‐Valve Transapical China 82 NA NA NA NA NA VARC 1 Severe pure AR with high surgical risk
Liu et al. (2019) J‐Valve Transapical China 53 76.4 ± 5.2 NA NA NA 6.3 ± 1.8 VARC‐2 Severe pure AR with high surgical risk
Delhomme et al. (2023) SAPIEN 3 Transfemoral France 37 81 (69–85) 27 12.29 (8.1–22.26) 4.82 (2.46–6.86) NA VARC‐2 Severe pure AR with high or prohibitive surgical risk
Yin et al. (2022) Evolut R, J‐Valve Transfemoral, transapical China 10 72.8 ± 11.7 7 NA NA 6.2 ± 4.1 VARC‐2 Severe pure native AR with high surgical risk
Pracon et al. (2022) Evolut R, SAPIEN 3 Transfemoral The United Kingdom 17 NA NA NA NA NA VARC‐3 Severe pure aortic regurgitation with high surgical risk
Purita et al. (2020) ACURATE neo Transfemoral Italy 24 79.4 (50–88) 10 (41.6) NA 5 ± 4.05 3.9 ± 2.37 VARC‐2 Severe pure aortic regurgitation with high or prohibitive surgical risk
Anwaruddin et al. (2019) Evolut R Transfemoral The United States 149 68.9 ± 15.1 80 (54) NA NA 8.6 ± 9.9 NA Pure or mixed, with predominantly moderate or severe AR
Toggweiler et al. (2018) ACURATE neo Transfemoral Switzerland 20 79 ± 8 NA NA NA 8.3 ± 9.3 NA Severe pure AR with high surgical risk
De Backer et al. (2018) Evolut, ACURATE, Portico, SAPIEN 3, Lotus, Direct Flow, JenaValve, Engager Transapical, transformal Denmark 145 75 ± 10 69 (49) NA NA 6.2 ± 4.9 VARC‐2 Severe native AR without significant stenosis with prohibitive surgical risk
De Backer et al. (2017) JenaValve, Evolut R, Direct Flow, Symetis, Lotus, Engager, SAPIEN 3, Portico Transapical, transformal Denmark 118 NA NA NA NA 5.7 ± 5.2 NA Severe native AR without significant stenosis
Yoon et al. (2017) SAPIEN 3, Evolut R, JenaValve, Direct Flow, J‐Valve, Engager, Portico, ACURATE, Lotus Transapical, transformal The United States 212 74.5 ± 11.6 104 NA 8.9 ± 9.4 6.2 ± 6.7 VARC‐2 Severe pure AR with high surgical or prohibitive risk
Sawaya et al. (2017) Evolut R, JenaValve, Direct Flow, Lotus, SAPIEN 3 Transapical, transformal, transsubclavian Denmark 41 NA NA NA NA NA VARC‐2 Severe pure native AR with high surgical risk
Schofer et al. (2015) Direct Flow Transfemoral Germany 11 74.7 ± 12.9 4 19.9 ± 7.1 NA 8.84 ± 8.9 VARC‐2 Symptomatic severe pure AR with high or prohibitive surgical risk

AR, aortic regurgitation; IQR, inter‐quartile range; LES, logistic EuroSCORE; NA, not available; STS, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score; VARC‐1, Valve Academic Research Consortium‐1; VARC‐2, Valve Academic Research Consortium‐2; VARC‐3, Valve Academic Research Consortium‐3.