Table 4.

Parameter estimates for mediation models.

	model	estimate (s.e.)	LCI	UCI	p
feedback versus control	adherence	0.15 (0.87)	−1.58	1.88	0.866
social versus control	adherence	0.46 (0.88)	−1.28	2.19	0.603
feedback versus control	motivation	3.51 (4.03)	−4.47	11.49	0.386
social versus control	motivation	7.67 (4.10)	−0.45	15.80	0.064
adherence	Δ healthy ratings	0.04 (0.28)	−0.51	0.59	0.898
feedback versus control	Δ healthy ratings	−2.00 (2.71)	−7.37	3.36	0.462
social versus control	Δ healthy ratings	0.37 (2.73)	−5.03	5.78	0.892
indirect effect		0.01	−0.51	0.97	.97
motivation	Δ healthy ratings	0.17 (0.06)	0.05	0.29	0.006
feedback versus control	Δ healthy ratings	−2.51 (2.69)	−7.83	2.82	0.353
social versus control	Δ healthy ratings	−1.23 (2.77)	−6.76	4.20	0.645
indirect effect		0.60	−0.86	2.48	0.39
adherence	Δ unhealthy ratings	−0.70 (0.28)	−1.26	−0.14	0.015
feedback versus control	Δ unhealthy ratings	0.53 (2.76)	−4.94	6.00	0.848
social versus control	Δ unhealthy ratings	0.67 (2.78)	−4.84	6.17	0.810
indirect effect		−0.10	−1.45	1.14	0.85
motivation	Δ unhealthy ratings	−0.04 (0.06)	−0.17	0.09	0.506
feedback versus control	Δ unhealthy ratings	0.25 (2.87)	−5.44	5.94	0.890
social versus control	Δ unhealthy ratings	−0.41 (2.96)	−6.27	5.45	0.890
indirect effect		−0.11	−0.87	0.99	0.88
adherence	Δ snacking	−0.08 (0.17)	−0.42	0.25	0.618
feedback versus control	Δ snacking	−4.54 (1.66)	−7.81	−1.26	0.007
social versus control	Δ snacking	−2.72 (1.67)	−6.02	0.58	0.105
indirect effect		−0.01	−0.35	0.36	0.92
motivation	Δ snacking	−0.03 (0.04)	−0.11	0.04	0.419
feedback versus control	Δ snacking	−4.69 (1.70)	−8.05	−1.33	0.007
social versus control	Δ snacking	−2.81 (1.66)	−6.04	0.87	0.141
indirect effect		−0.11	−0.65	0.36	0.71