Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 14;6(3):10.1128/microbiolspec.arba-0022-2017. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.arba-0022-2017

TABLE 1.

Percentages of resistance of P. multocida, M. haemolytica, H. somni, and A. pleuropneumoniae isolates from different animal sources against selected antimicrobial agents

Bacteria Origin Year(s) of isolation No. of isolates % resistant isolatesa Reference
PEN XNL FLO ENR TET TIL TUL
P. multocida Cattle/USA, Canada 2009 328 3.3 0.0 11.6 2.1 40.8 23.8 4.6 37
Cattle/Germany 2013 48 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.4 2.1 0.0 35
Adult swine/Germany 2013 90 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 35
Weaner/Germany 2013 25 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 35
Piglet/Germany 2013 35 2.9 0.0 2.9 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 35
Dogs, cats/Germany 2004–2006 72 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36
M. haemolytica Cattle/USA, Canada 2009 304 27.3 0.0 8.6 6.6 43.7 27.3 8.9 37
Calf/Germany 2012–2013 63 11.1 0.0 1.6 0.0 22.2 1.6 0.0 35
Adult cattle/Germany 2012–2013 35 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 2.9 35
Sheep, goat/Germany 2012–2013 42 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 35
H. somni Cattle/USA, Canada 2009 174 4.5 0.0 1.7 7.4 42.5 18.4 10.9 37
A. pleuropneumoniae Swine/Germany 2012 102 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.7 1.0 7.8 35
a

PEN, penicillin G; XNL, ceftiofur; FLO, florfenicol; ENR, enrofloxacin; TET, tetracycline; TIL, tilmicosin; TUL, tulathromycin.