|
Green Perceived Value (GPV) [134] |
0.807 |
1.677 |
|
0.873 |
0.633 |
| GPV1: “I purchase sustainable clothing because it is environmentally friendly.” |
|
|
0.787 |
|
|
| GPV2: “I purchase sustainable clothing because it has more environmental benefits than other products.” |
|
|
0.746 |
|
|
| GPV3: “Purchasing sustainable clothing would make a good impression on others.” |
|
|
0.748 |
|
|
| GPV4: “When I buy sustainable clothing products, I get value for its money.” |
|
|
0.761 |
|
|
|
Green Perceived Quality (GPQ) [133] |
0.868 |
9.284 |
|
0.904 |
0.654 |
| GPQ1: “The quality of sustainable clothing is regarded as the best benchmark with respect to environmental concern.” |
|
|
0.760 |
|
|
| GPQ2: “The quality of sustainable clothing is reliable with respect to environmental consideration.” |
|
|
0.767 |
|
|
| GPQ3: “The quality of sustainable clothing is durable with respect to environmental performance.” |
|
|
0.758 |
|
|
| GPQ4: “The quality of sustainable clothing is excellent with respect to environmental image.” |
|
|
0.787 |
|
|
| GPQ5: “The quality of sustainable clothing is professional with respect to environmental reputation.” |
|
|
0.762 |
|
|
|
Perceived Price (PP) [132, 139] |
0.796 |
1.464 |
|
0.858 |
0.669 |
| PP1: “Price is a major concern for me to go for sustainable clothing.” |
|
|
0.793 |
|
|
| PP2: “The price of sustainable clothing is acceptable.” |
|
|
|
|
|
| PP3: “Sustainable clothing has a fairly affordable price.” |
|
|
0.780 |
|
|
| PP4: “I think the price of sustainable clothing is in line with the value of the product.” |
|
|
0.766 |
|
|
|
Social Influence (SI) [27] |
0.825 |
2.116 |
|
0.884 |
0.656 |
| SI1: “I learn from my friends, family and classmates about sustainable clothing products.” |
|
|
0.753 |
|
|
| SI2: “If my friends purchase sustainable clothing products, I will buy them.” |
|
|
0.772 |
|
|
| SI3: “I will share information on how to buy sustainable clothing products with my friends.” |
|
|
0.794 |
|
|
| SI4: “Most of my friends and family buy sustainable clothing products.” |
|
|
0.756 |
|
|
|
Product Design (PD) [136, 140] |
0.758 |
1.535 |
|
0.861 |
0.674 |
| PD1: “The clothing has a classic design, aesthetically sustainable over time.” |
|
|
0.778 |
|
|
| PD2: “The design of the clothing is optimal and can be recycled into other products.” |
|
|
0.779 |
|
|
| PD3: “The design of sustainable clothing is simple but beautiful.” |
|
|
0.776 |
|
|
|
Environment Concern (EC) [131, 135, 138] |
0.808 |
1.829 |
|
0.874 |
0.634 |
| EC1: “Environmental protection will help people have a better quality of life.” |
|
|
0.750 |
|
|
| EC2: “I am concerned about environmental development.” |
|
|
0.780 |
|
|
| EC3: “I often think about the potential negative development of the environmental situation.” |
|
|
0.751 |
|
|
| EC4: “I am concerned that humanity will cause lasting damage towards the environment.” |
|
|
0.773 |
|
|
|
Environment Knowledge (EK) [27] |
0.778 |
1.594 |
|
0.871 |
0.692 |
| EK1: “I know what sustainable clothing is.” |
|
|
0.775 |
|
|
| EK2: “I know what an environmental label is.” |
|
|
0.817 |
|
|
| EK3: “I know that using sustainable clothing reduces the damage to the environment.” |
|
|
0.785 |
|
|
|
Environmental Attitude (EAT) [27] |
0.866 |
2.411 |
|
0.903 |
0.651 |
| EAT1: “Advocating an environmentally friendly lifestyle is necessary.” |
|
|
0.742 |
|
|
| EAT2: “I think the government needs to focus more on environmental protection.” |
|
|
0.748 |
|
|
| EAT3: “It is very important to promote consumers’ attention to environmental issues.” |
|
|
0.781 |
|
|
| EAT4: “I think it’s important to control environmental pollution.” |
|
|
0.762 |
|
|
| EAT5: “I think the earth’s resources are limited, so environmental protection is important.” |
|
|
0.745 |
|
|
|
Product Attitude (PAT) [27] |
0.828 |
1.954 |
|
0.886 |
0.659 |
| PAT1: “I prefer using sustainable clothing products over other general clothing products.” |
|
|
0.771 |
|
|
| PAT2: “I think purchasing sustainable clothing products is good for me.” |
|
|
0.728 |
|
|
| PAT3: “I think sustainable clothing products that can reduce environmental damage are important.” |
|
|
0.752 |
|
|
| PAT4: “I am willing to purchase sustainable clothing products that are good for the environment.” |
|
|
0.760 |
|
|
|
Purchase Intention (PI) [137, 139] |
0.824 |
2.000 |
|
0.883 |
0.654 |
| PI1: “I consider purchasing sustainable clothing.” |
|
|
0.751 |
|
|
| PI2: “I intend to buy sustainable clothing instead of conventional clothing in the future.” |
|
|
0.757 |
|
|
| PI3: “I might possibly buy sustainable clothing in the future.” |
|
|
0.776 |
|
|
| PI4: “I would consider buying sustainable clothing if I happen to see them in a (n) (online) store.” |
|
|
0.771 |
|
|
