Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 12;41(12):msae234. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msae234

Table 3.

Physical (in millions of base pairs, Mb) and genetic distances (in centimorgans, cM) that were covered by the largest linkage group in each chromosome, by species

            L subgenome S subgenome
Species Sex Mb cM cM/Mb F/M cM/Mb ratio Mb cM cM/Mb F/M cM/Mb ratio Mb cM cM/Mb F/M cM/Mb fm ratio
X. tropicalis F 1401 1191 0.85 (0.07) 1.32a ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
M 1342 867 0.65 (0.12) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
X. laevis F 2450 1964 0.80 (0.08) 1.50a 1355 992 0.73 (0.05) 1.31a 1095 973 0.89 (0.16) 1.75
M 2549 1367 0.54 (0.04) 1405 785 0.56 (0.05) 1144 582 0.51 (0.07)
X. borealis F 2324 1739 0.75 (0.07) 2.66a 1261 910 0.72 (0.12) 3.07a 1063 829 0.78 (0.09) 2.29a
M 2402 675 0.28 (0.04) 1342 315 0.23 (0.03) 1060 360 0.34 (0.07)

ND - Not Defined.

The ratio of these distances (cM/Mb) and the female:male ratio of these ratios (F/M cM/Mb ratio) allows for comparisons of the average genome-wide recombination rate during oogenesis (F) and spermatogenesis (M). These statistics were also calculated for the L and S subgenomes (L and S subgenome, respectively) of the allotetraploids X. laevis and X. borealis. The weighted standard error of the mean is given in the parentheses. aSignificant departure of the F/M cM/Mb ratio from the null expectation of no bias (see Materials and Methods).