Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 26;16(11):7787–7796. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1394

Table 1. Differences in treatment approaches for limited-stage small cell esophageal cancer between China and the United States.

Characteristics China SEER
All (n=483) S (n=141) NCT (n=171) CRT (n=171) P All (n=128) S (n=17) NAT (n=12) CRT (n=67) CT (n=26) RT (n=6) P
Sex 0.80 0.12
   Female 136 41 (30.1) 50 (36.8) 45 (33.1) 42 4 (9.5) 2 (4.8) 20 (47.6) 14 (33.3) 2 (4.8)
   Male 347 100 (28.8) 121 (34.9) 126 (36.3) 86 13 (15.1) 10 (11.6) 47 (54.7) 12 (14.0) 4 (4.7)
Age, years 0.01 0.03
   ≤60 212 61 (28.8) 89 (42.0) 62 (29.2) 36 5 (13.9) 8 (22.2) 17 (47.2) 6 (16.7) 0 (0.0)
   >60 271 80 (29.5) 82 (30.3) 109 (40.2) 92 12 (13.0) 4 (4.3) 50 (54.3) 20 (21.7) 6 (6.5)
Tumor location 0.45 0.01
   Proximal/middle third 329 101 (30.7) 111 (33.7) 117 (35.6) 52 8 (15.4) 2 (3.8) 27 (51.9) 15 (28.8) 0 (0.0)
   Distal third 154 40 (26.0) 60 (39.0) 54 (35.1) 61 8 (13.1) 9 (14.8) 33 (54.1) 9 (14.8) 2 (3.3)
   Unknown 0 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 15 1 (6.7) 1 (6.7) 7 (46.7) 2 (13.3) 4 (26.7)
T stage <0.001 0.15
   T1/2 202 74 (36.6) 78 (38.6) 50 (24.8) 29 5 (17.2) 2 (6.9) 13 (44.8) 7 (24.1) 2 (6.9)
   T3/4 281 67 (23.8) 93 (33.1) 121 (43.1) 32 4 (12.5) 4 (12.5) 22 (68.8) 1 (3.1) 1 (3.1)
   Unknown 0 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 67 8 (11.9) 6 (9.0) 32 (47.8) 18 (26.9) 3 (4.5)
N stage <0.001 0.64
   N0 174 57 (32.8) 76 (43.7) 41 (23.6) 20 3 (15.0) 2 (10.0) 13 (65.0) 1 (5.0) 1 (5.0)
   N+ 309 84 (27.2) 95 (30.7) 130 (42.1) 11 1 (9.1) 2 (18.2) 6 (54.5) 2 (18.2) 0 (0.0)
   Unknown 0 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 97 13 (13.4) 8 (8.2) 48 (49.5) 23 (23.7) 5 (5.2)

Data are presented as n (%). S, upfront surgery; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; S, upfront surgery; NCT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; NAT, neoadjuvant therapy; CT, chemotherapy; RT, radiotherapy.