Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 26;13(11):1894–1906. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-211

Table 4. Comparison of original BI-RADS scores and CEUS rerated BI-RADS scores with pathology results.

BI-RADS category Rerated BI-RADS category Pathology
DCIS (n=66) DCISM (n=23)
3 (n=5) 3 (n=1) 1 0
4A (n=3) 2 1
4B (n=1) 1 0
4C (n=0) 0 0
5 (n=0) 0 0
4A (n=39) 3 (n=3) 3 0
4A (n=15) 15 0
4B (n=11) 9 2
4C (n=7) 3 4
5 (n=3) 2 1
4B (n=28) 3 (n=0) 0 0
4A (n=3) 3 0
4B (n=8) 5 3
4C (n=14) 9 5
5 (n=3) 3 0
4C (n=13) 3 (n=0) 0 0
4A (n=0) 0 0
4B (n=1) 0 1
4C (n=6) 5 1
5 (n=6) 3 3
5 (n=4) 3 (n=0) 0 0
4A (n=0) 0 0
4B (n=0) 0 0
4C (n=1) 1 0
5 (n=3) 1 2

BI-RADS, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System; CEUS, contrast-enhanced ultrasound; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; DCISM, ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion.