Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 26;9(49):48855–48866. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c09642

Table 1. Summary of Faradaic Efficiency (FE%) Values of Micro-Bi-180s, Micro-Bi-300s, and Micro-Bi-1800s.a.

micro-Bi-180s
V vs RHE FE% for formate FE% for CH4 FE% for CO FE% for H2
–0.776 93.55 0 0.72 4.5
–0.976 92.95 0 2.82 1.85
–1.176 82.28 0.88 2.22 16.91
–1.376 71.71 0.44 0.89 29.27
micro-Bi-300s
V vs RHE FE% for formate FE% for CH4 FE% for CO FE% for H2
–0.776 93.38 0 2.16 6.26
–0.976 92.69 0.49 2.5 7.09
–1.176 75.77 0.97 1.395 23.465
–1.376 49.67 0.48 0.785 52.84
micro-Bi-1800s
V vs RHE FE% for formate FE% for CH4 FE% for CO FE% for H2
–0.776 84.07 0 2.32 10.90
–0.976 94.46 0 3.06 5.13
–1.176 85.48 0.64 1.96 13.65
–1.376 61.21 0.69 1.21 38.20
a

Summary of Faradaic efficiency (FE%) values for formate, CH4, CO, and H2 with micro-Bi-180s, micro-Bi-300s, and micro-Bi-1800s determined by 30 min of chronoamperometry under a constant CO2 flow at four different potential biases (−0.776, −0.976, −1.176, and −1.376 V vs. RHE)