Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the effects of nurses’ emotional eating behaviour and burnout levels on job performance. The population of this descriptive and cross-sectional study covered 750 nurses working in İstanbul Haseki Training and Research Hospital, and the sample included 255 nurses. The data were collected between 15.08.2023 and 15.11.2023 using the ‘Personal Information Form’, ‘Maslach Burnout Inventory’, ‘Emotional Eater Questionnaire’, and ‘Job Performance Scale’. The mean scores of the Maslach Burnout Inventory and Emotional Eater Questionnaire of the participant nurses who had been working for 1-5 years, who were dissatisfied with their work and who worked in intensive care were found significantly higher. A positive relationship was found between the Job Performance Scale, the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Emotional Eater Questionnaire. Based on the obtained data, it was concluded that nurses experience burnout and exhibit emotional eating behaviour. Therefore, it is recommended to support nurses in managing burnout and stress, plan training sessions, and, if necessary, provide psychiatric support. Processes in the work environment can negatively affect nurses emotionally and physically, which is reflected in job performance and patient care. Burnout affects not only job performance but also emotional eating.
Keywords: emotional eating, burnout, job performance, job satisfaction, nurse
‘Nurses may experience stress due to the responsibilities of having children and may consequently exhibit emotional eating behaviour’.
Introduction
Although it was thought that burnout would only be seen in human care professionals, it was later seen that it could develop in every profession. 1 Factors such as exposure to traumatic events, workload, long working hours, wages, and lack of social support affect burnout. 2 Documenting patient care and paperwork can also lead to burnout. 3 Burnout can have detrimental effects on attitudes towards the organization, employee performance, and even work misbehaviour. 4 Therefore, occupational stress includes situations where work-related characteristics negatively affect a person’s physical or mental health and cause stress. 5 Burnout is a syndrome and its symptoms may lead an individual to seek help because they cause a physical or emotional problem. 6 Therefore, burnout leads to high levels of emotional exhaustion, cynicism or depersonalization. 1
Emotional eating is not an eating disorder but is a type of eating behaviour that is affected by habits, stress, emotions, and individual attitudes toward eating. 7 Emotional or comfort eating and stress-induced eating tend to eat in response to emotions that the individual perceives as negative, often consuming energy-dense, nutrient-poor, and palatable foods. 8 Some people reduce their food intake when exposed to stress or negative emotions, while others increase it. However, it is not clear who will exhibit emotional overeating under what conditions. 9 Since acceptance by others promotes fitness in the course of evolution, humans have developed biopsychological mechanisms to inform themselves of threats to acceptance or belonging and emotional systems to manage threats to acceptance. 10
In health services, job performance is a reflection of positive or negative elements within the organization and can affect service users. 11 Successfully fulfilling activities in patient care plays a vital role in nurses’ job performance and is a critical element of providing superior quality service. 12 Job satisfaction is important to nurses’ lives and affects patient safety, performance, quality of care, and commitment to the institution and profession. 13 Job satisfaction has a strong relationship with job performance. Policymakers should consider interventions such as strengthened human resources policies and improved working conditions and wages to increase job satisfaction among professional nurses. 13 Employees with high levels of burnout will have a higher tendency to quit their jobs. 14 Thus, this study was conducted to determine the effects of emotional eating behaviour and burnout levels of nurses on job performance.
Methods
Study Design and Participants
This study was carried out in a descriptive and cross-sectional design to determine the effects of emotional eating behaviour and burnout levels of nurses on job performance. After obtaining the necessary ethics committee and institutional permission, data were collected from nurses by face-to-face interview method in ‘İstanbul Haseki Training and Research Hospital between 15.08.2023 and 15.11.2023. The study population covered 750 nurses and the sample included 255 nurses, calculated using a sampling method for a known population. Inclusion criteria were i) working in the institution on the specified study dates and ii) being a nurse.
Data Collection Tools
The Personal Information Form consists of 17 questions prepared by the researchers to determine the sociodemographic and work-related characteristics of nurses.
The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) was developed by Maslach and Jackson (1981). The 5-point Likert-type scale has 22 items in three subscales, namely, Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DE) and Personal Accomplishment (PA). The validity and reliability study of the scale for Turkey was conducted by Ergin (1992). 15 Three separate scores are calculated for each individual, ranging from 0 = never to 4 = always. Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients for the three dimensions, as reported from the validity and reliability tests in its adaptation into Turkish, were 0.83 for EE, 0.65 for DE and 0.72 for PA. 15 In this study, the reliability scores were found as α = 0.798 for the overall inventory and as α = 0.605, α = 0.738, and α = 0.891 for DE, PA and EE, respectively.
The Emotional Eater Questionnaire (EEQ-TR) was developed by Garaulet et al (2012) and its Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Arslantaş et al. (2020). 16 It has ten items based on self-report. The items can be answered as ‘Never’, ‘Sometimes’, ‘Usually’, and ‘Always’. The alpha internal consistency coefficient, a measure reflecting the scale’s reliability, was calculated as 0.84. The scale has a three-factor structure: Disinhibition, Type of Food, and Guilt. The corrected item-total score correlation coefficients of each item are above 0.34. The items are scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale. Higher scores indicate a high level of emotional eating tendency. In the original study, Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was determined as 0.85. 16 In this study, Cronbach’s alpha values were 0.90 for the overall scale, and 0.58, 0.65, and 0.88 for Guilt, Type of Food, and Disinhibition, respectively.
The Job Performance Scale (JPS) was used to determine the job performance of the participants in the study. Nine of the statements were developed by Goodman and Syvantek (1999) to assess task performance, while the other seven statements were prepared by Jawahar and Carr (2007) to measure contextual performance. The scale’s validity and reliability were demonstrated in the studies conducted by Bağcı (2014). 17 The scale has a 5-point Likert-type answer key. According to the results of the related analyses, the Scale’s overall Cronbach’s Alpha value was 0.91, 0.91 for Task Performance and 0.90 for Contextual Performance. 17 In this study, the Cronbach’s Alpha values were 0.91 for the Job Performance Scale, and 0.89 for Task Performance, and 0.78 for Contextual Performance subscales.
Statistical Analyses
Data were analyzed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) 26.0 program. Descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage values), the ‘Mann-Whitney U test’ for pairwise comparisons, the ‘Kruskall Wallis test’ for three or more comparisons, and ‘Spearman correlation’ analysis were used to examine the relationship between the scales.
Ethics Considerations
The study was conducted following the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. Permission was obtained from the ethics committee of XXX University (Date: 26.05.2023 / No: 2023/11) to evaluate the ethical suitability of the research. Permission was obtained from the owners of the instruments to use them in the study. Institutional permission (Date: 15.08.2023 / No: 2023/12) was obtained from XXX Training and Research Hospital. The purpose of the study was explained to the nurses, and their written consent was obtained with a voluntary consent form to participate in the study in line with the principle of voluntariness.
Results
In this study, 48.2% of the nurses were between the ages of 27-32 (n = 123), 63.1% were female (n = 161), 47.8% had an income equal to expenses (n = 122), 71% were single (n = 181), 82.4% had no children (n = 210), 53.3% had one child (n = 24), 82.7% graduated from a bachelor’s degree program (n = 211), 35.7% worked in a service (n = 91), 52.2% chose the department they worked in willingly (n = 133), 59.6% worked for 1-5 years (n = 152), 85.9% worked in shifts both day and night (n = 219), 36.5% were mostly satisfied with their job (n = 93), 34.5% sometimes felt burnout (n = 88), 58% did not smoke (n = 148), 79.6% did not consume alcohol (n = 203), 52.5% skipped meals during the day (n = 134), 47.4% skipped breakfast (n = 64), and 76.5% believed that emotional changes affected their nutritional status (n = 195) presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Distribution of Nurses’ Sociodemographic Characteristics (n = 255).
| Sociodemographics | n | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 21-26 years old | 116 | 45.5 |
| 27-32 years old | 123 | 48.2 | |
| 33-37 years old | 16 | 6.3 | |
| Gender | Female | 161 | 63.1 |
| Male | 94 | 36.9 | |
| Income | Income is less than expenses | 91 | 35.7 |
| Income equals expenses | 122 | 47.8 | |
| Income is more than expenses | 42 | 16.5 | |
| Marital status | Married | 74 | 29 |
| Single | 181 | 71 | |
| Having children | Yes | 45 | 17.6 |
| No | 210 | 82.4 | |
| Number of children | 1 | 24 | 53.3 |
| 2 | 15 | 33.3 | |
| 3 or more | 6 | 13.4 | |
| Education | Associate degree | 44 | 17.3 |
| Bachelor’s degree | 211 | 82.7 | |
| Unit | Paediatric emergency | 42 | 16.5 |
| Adult emergency | 43 | 16.9 | |
| Intensive care | 79 | 31 | |
| Service | 91 | 35.7 | |
| Having chosen the worked unit willingly | Yes | 133 | 52.2 |
| No | 122 | 47.8 | |
| Worked years | Less than 1 year | 37 | 14.5 |
| 1-5 years | 152 | 59.6 | |
| More than 5 years | 66 | 25.9 | |
| Shift pattern | Only night | 2 | 0.8 |
| Only day | 34 | 13.3 | |
| Both night and day | 219 | 85.9 | |
| Satisfaction with job | Yes | 73 | 28.6 |
| Mostly | 93 | 36.5 | |
| Sometimes | 53 | 20.8 | |
| No | 36 | 14.1 | |
| Feeling burned out | Yes | 57 | 22.4 |
| Mostly | 74 | 29 | |
| Sometimes | 88 | 34.5 | |
| No | 36 | 14.1 | |
| Smoking | Yes | 107 | 42 |
| No | 148 | 58 | |
| Consuming alcohol | Yes | 52 | 20.4 |
| No | 203 | 79.6 | |
| Skipping meals | Yes | 134 | 52.5 |
| No | 121 | 47.5 | |
| Meal skipped | Breakfast | 64 | 47.4 |
| Lunch | 53 | 39.3 | |
| Dinner | 18 | 13.3 | |
| Thinking that emotional changes affect eating | Yes | 195 | 76.5 |
| No | 60 | 23.5 | |
According to the findings obtained from the study, the mean scale scores were found as Maslach Burnout Inventory (46.76 ± 10.06), Emotional Eater Questionnaire (11.87 ± 6.45) and Job Performance Scale (59.04 ± 9.33). The mean scores of the scale and its subscales are presented in Table 2.
Table 2.
Scale Mean Scores.
| Scales | Min-Max | ± SD |
|---|---|---|
| Maslach burnout inventory | 20-73 | 46.76 ± 10.06 |
| Emotional exhaustion | 0-36 | 19.42 ± 7.15 |
| Depersonalization | 0-19 | 7.51 ± 3.56 |
| Personal accomplishment | 4-32 | 19.82 ± 4.43 |
| Emotional eater questionnaire | 0-30 | 11.87 ± 6.45 |
| Disinhibition | 0-18 | 7.09 ± 4.21 |
| Type of food | 0-6 | 2.68 ± 1.63 |
| Guilt | 0-6 | 2.09 ± 1.45 |
| Job performance scale | 30-80 | 59.04 ± 9.33 |
| Task performance | 16-45 | 33.56 ± 5.70 |
| Contextual performance | 13-35 | 25.47 ± 4.38 |
When examined in terms of gender, Emotional Exhaustion, MBI, Disinhibition, Type of Food, Guilt, EEQ, Task Performance and JPS scores were significantly higher in women (P < 0.05). For income level, Emotional Exhaustion, Depersonalization, MBI, Disinhibition, Type of Food, Guilt, EEQ scores were significantly higher in income is less than expenses, Contextual Performance scores was significantly higher in income equals expenses (P < 0.05). When the status of having children was examined, the average scores of Type of Food, Guilt and EEQ were found to be significantly higher for those who did not have children (P < 0.05). The Emotional Exhaustion and MBI scores of the service nurses, the Depersonalization scores of the Intensive care unit nurses, and the Task Performance, Contextual Performance and JPS scores of the Paediatric emergency unit nurses were found to be significantly higher (P < 0.05). When the working years are examined, the Emotional Exhaustion and MBI scores of those who have worked for 1-5 years are significantly higher, and the Type of Food scores of those who have worked for less than 1 year are significantly higher (P < 0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Nurses’ Scale Scores by Demographic Information.
| Scales | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maslach Burnout Inventory | Emotional Eater Questionnaire | Job Performance Scale | ||||||||||
| Emotional exhaustion | Depersonalization | Personal accomplishment | Total | Disinhibition | Type of food | Guilt | Total | Task performance | Contextual performance | Total | ||
| Gender | Female | 20.36 ± 7.25 | 7.56 ± 3.45 | 20.07 ± 4.29 | 48.00 ± 9.73 | 7.65 ± 4.34 | 2.96 ± 1.58 | 2.25 ± 1.44 | 12.87 ± 6.54 | 34.18 ± 5.26 | 25.86 ± 4.19 | 60.04 ± 8.57 |
| Male | 17.80 ± 6.70 | 7.43 ± 3.78 | 19.40 ± 4.67 | 44.64 ± 10.33 | 6.13 ± 3.83 | 2.20 ± 1.30 | 1.82 ± 1.43 | 10.17 ± 5.95 | 32.52 ± 6.28 | 24.80 ± 4.64 | 57.32 ± 10.32 | |
|
p:0.014 U: 6178.000 Z: 2.449 |
p: 0.853 U: 7462.500 Z: 0.185 |
p: 0.168 U: 6787.500 Z: 1.379 |
p: 0.013 U: 6155.000 Z: 2.490 |
p: 0.011 U: 6127.000 Z: 2.549 |
p: 0.000 U: 5389.500 Z: 3.938 |
p: 0.033 U: 6384.000 Z: 2.131 |
p: 0.001 U: 5766.000 Z: 3.180 |
p: 0.030 U: 6339.000 Z: 2.170 |
p: 0.066 U: 6526.000 Z: 1.841 |
p: 0.029 U: 6333.000 Z: 2.177 |
||
| Income | Income is less than expenses | 21.30 ± 7.64 | 8.28 ± 3.57 | 19.84 ± 4.42 | 49.43 ± 10.31 | 8.04 ± 3.88 | 2.98 ± 1.46 | 2.26 ± 1.52 | 13.29 ± 6.01 | 33.27 ± 5.93 | 25.32 ± 4.44 | 58.60 ± 9.47 |
| Income equals expenses | 18.34 ± 6.52 | 6.83 ± 3.23 | 20.18 ± 4.11 | 45.36 ± 8.57 | 7.09 ± 4.03 | 2.64 ± 1.47 | 2.14 ± 1.38 | 11.88 ± 6.18 | 34.11 ± 5.25 | 26.19 ± 4.28 | 60.31 ± 8.86 | |
| Income is more than expenses | 18.47 ± 7.09 | 7.83 ± 4.13 | 18.73 ± 5.23 | 45.04 ± 12.37 | 5.07 ± 4.76 | 2.11 ± 1.68 | 1.59 ± 1.39 | 8.78 ± 7.16 | 32.61 ± 6.39 | 23.71 ± 4.12 | 56.33 ± 9.88 | |
| Total | 19.42 ± 7.15 | 7.51 ± 3.56 | 19.82 ± 4.43 | 46.76 ± 10.06 | 7.09 ± 4.21 | 2.68 ± 1.53 | 2.09 ± 1.45 | 11.87 ± 6.45 | 33.56 ± 5.70 | 25.47 ± 4.38 | 59.04 ± 9.33 | |
|
p: 0.015 KWX2: 8.428 |
p: 0.009 KWX2: 9.487 |
p: 0.409 KWX2: 1.787 |
p: 0.007 KWX2: 10.057 |
p: 0.000 KWX2: 18.689 |
p: 0.008 KWX2: 9.696 |
p: 0.030 KWX2: 7.001 |
p: 0.000 KWX2: 16.598 |
p: 0.333 KWX2: 2.198 |
p: 0.005 KWX2: 10.558 |
p: 0.059 KWX2: 5.673 |
||
| Having children | Yes | 19.40 ± 8.15 | 7.35 ± 3.66 | 19.00 ± 4.79 | 45.75 ± 11.84 | 6.22 ± 3.84 | 2.11 ± 1.33 | 1.42 ± 1.35 | 9.75 ± 5.93 | 33.37 ± 6.48 | 25.22 ± 4.79 | 58.60 ± 10.44 |
| No | 19.42 ± 6.93 | 7.55 ± 3.55 | 20.00 ± 4.35 | 45.98 ± 9.66 | 7.28 ± 4.27 | 2.80 ± 1.54 | 2.24 ± 1.43 | 12.33 ± 6.48 | 33.60 ± 5.54 | 25.53 ± 4.30 | 59.14 ± 9.09 | |
| p: 0.944 U: 4693.500 Z: 0.070 |
p: 0.960 U: 4702.500 Z: 0.050 |
p: 0.120 U: 4030.000 Z: 1.556 |
p: 0.625 U: 4506.000 Z: 0.489 |
p: 0.351 U: 4308.500 Z: 0.933 |
p: 0.007 U: 3545.500 Z: 2.499 |
p: 0.000 U: 3174.000 Z: 3.536 |
p: 0.026 U: 3726.000 Z: 2.232 |
p: 0.966 U: 4706.000 Z: 0.042 |
p: 0.820 U: 4623.500 Z: 0.227 |
p: 0.969 U: 4707.500 Z: 0.039 |
||
| Worked unit | Paediatric emergency | 18.33 ± 9.00 | 6.54 ± 3.93 | 20.42 ± 4.41 | 45.30 ± 11.92 | 6.97 ± 4.69 | 2.97 ± 1.64 | 1.78 ± 1.55 | 11.73 ± 7.02 | 35.95 ± 4.36 | 26.42 ± 4.16 | 62.38 ± 7.88 |
| Adult emergency | 16.27 ± 6.82 | 8.02 ± 3.80 | 20.25 ± 3.78 | 43.55 ± 9.51 | 6.74 ± 3.64 | 2.46 ± 1.07 | 2.18 ± 1.43 | 11.39 ± 5.32 | 33.37 ± 4.94 | 26.39 ± 4.01 | 59.76 ± 8.47 | |
| Intensive care | 20.34 ± 6.47 | 8.44 ± 3.44 | 18.72 ± 4.59 | 47.50 ± 9.32 | 6.68 ± 4.19 | 2.51 ± 1.56 | 1.94 ± 1.29 | 11.15 ± 6.54 | 32.24 ± 6.17 | 23.98 ± 3.64 | 56.22 ± 9.19 | |
| Service | 20.61 ± 6.47 | 7.39 ± 3.24 | 20.30 ± 4.49 | 48.31 ± 9.74 | 7.68 ± 4.25 | 2.79 ± 1.61 | 2.32 ± 1.52 | 12.80 ± 6.57 | 33.71 ± 5.87 | 25.90 ± 4.95 | 59.61 ± 9.89 | |
| Total | 19.42 ± 7.15 | 7.51 ± 3.56 | 19.82 ± 4.43 | 46.76 ± 10.06 | 7.09 ± 4.21 | 2.68 ± 1.53 | 2.09 ± 1.45 | 11.87 ± 6.45 | 33.56 ± 5.70 | 25.47 ± 4.38 | 59.04 ± 9.33 | |
|
p: 0.018 KWX2: 10.120 |
p: 0.012 KWX2: 11.014 |
p: 0.059 KWX2: 7.436 |
p: 0.025 KWX2: 9.308 |
p: 0.176 KWX2: 4.945 |
p: 0.352 KWX2: 3.269 |
p: 0.113 KWX2: 5.965 |
p: 0.142 KWX2: 5.445 |
p: 0.011 KWX2: 11.206 |
p: 0.001 KWX2: 15.652 |
p: 0.014 KWX2: 10.610 |
||
| Worked years | Less than 1 year | 15.29 ± 6.97 | 6.89 ± 3.63 | 19.48 ± 3.96 | 41.67 ± 8.82 | 6.97 ± 4.15 | 3.02 ± 1.40 | 2.13 ± 1.37 | 12.13 ± 5.77 | 33.94 ± 5.08 | 26.18 ± 4.13 | 60.13 ± 8.53 |
| 1-5 years | 20.46 ± 7.08 | 7.78 ± 3.59 | 19.90 ± 4.52 | 48.15 ± 10.14 | 7.40 ± 4.38 | 2.77 ± 1.57 | 2.18 ± 1.46 | 12.36 ± 6.69 | 33.37 ± 5.86 | 25.35 ± 4.25 | 58.73 ± 9.38 | |
| More than 5 years | 19.34 ± 6.62 | 7.24 ± 3.46 | 19.83 ± 4.54 | 46.42 ± 9.73 | 6.46 ± 3.81 | 2.27 ± 1.44 | 1.87 ± 1.46 | 10.62 ± 6.17 | 33.80 ± 5.73 | 25.36 ± 4.83 | 59.16 ± 9.70 | |
| Total | 19.42 ± 7.15 | 7.51 ± 3.56 | 19.82 ± 4.43 | 46.76 ± 10.06 | 7.09 ± 4.21 | 2.68 ± 1.53 | 2.09 ± 1.45 | 11.87 ± 6.45 | 33.56 ± 5.70 | 25.47 ± 4.38 | 59.04 ± 9.33 | |
|
p: 0.000 KWX2: 16.728 |
p: 0.262 KWX2: 2.676 |
p: 0.847 KWX2: 0.333 |
p: 0.001 KWX2: 14.994 |
p: 0.666 KWX2: 0.814 |
p: 0.011 KWX2: 8.965 |
p: 0.431 KWX2: 1.682 |
p: 0.249 KWX2: 2.778 |
p: 0.783 KWX2: 0.489 |
p: 0.509 KWX2: 1.350 |
p: 0.793 KWX2: 0.463 |
||
Those who were dissatisfied with their jobs had significantly higher Emotional Exhaustion, Depersonalization, MBI, Disinhibition scores, Type of Food and EEQ scores (P < 0.05). Emotional Exhaustion, MBI, Disinhibition, Type of Food and EEQ scores were found to be higher in nurses who felt burnout (P < 0.05). Guilt and Contextual Performance scores were found to be significantly higher in those who felt mostly burnout (P < 0.05). Emotional Exhaustion, Depersonalization, MBI, Disinhibition, Type of Food and EEQ scores were found to be high in nurses who skipped meals (P < 0.05). Nurses who thought that emotional change affected eating had higher Emotional Exhaustion, Personal Accomplishment, MBI, Type of Food, Guilt, EEQ, Contextual Performance and JPS scores (P < 0.05). (Table 4)
Table 4.
Scale Scores According to Nurses’ Self-Assessment.
| Scales | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maslach Burnout Inventory | Emotional Eater Questionnaire | Job Performance Scale | ||||||||||
| Emotional exhaustion | Depersonalization | Personal accomplishment | Total | Disinhibition | Type of food | Guilt | Total | Task performance | Contextual performance | Total | ||
| Satisfaction with job | Yes | 15.82 ± 6.59 | 6.61 ± 3.60 | 20.20 ± 4.78 | 42.64 ± 9.51 | 6.26 ± 3.39 | 2.31 ± 1.21 | 1.84 ± 1.27 | 10.42 ± 5.08 | 33.57 ± 6.03 | 25.89 ± 4.34 | 59.46 ± 9.73 |
| Mostly | 18.23 ± 5.77 | 7.30 ± 3.06 | 20.15 ± 3.93 | 45.68 ± 8.57 | 6.38 ± 3.93 | 2.47 ± 1.40 | 1.92 ± 1.19 | 10.78 ± 5.74 | 33.96 ± 4.46 | 26.09 ± 4.27 | 60.06 ± 7.79 | |
| Sometimes | 21.56 ± 6.35 | 8.22 ± 3.90 | 19.60 ± 4.76 | 49.39 ± 9.79 | 8.24 ± 5.06 | 3.13 ± 1.73 | 2.56 ± 1.74 | 13.94 ± 7.92 | 33.18 ± 6.01 | 24.96 ± 4.19 | 58.15 ± 9.72 | |
| No | 26.63 ± 6.54 | 8.86 ± 3.74 | 18.55 ± 4.36 | 54.05 ± 10.50 | 8.94 ± 4.24 | 3.30 ± 1.80 | 2.36 ± 1.74 | 14.61 ± 6.87 | 33.08 ± 7.36 | 23.80 ± 4.72 | 56.88 ± 11.29 | |
| Total | 19.42 ± 7.15 | 7.51 ± 3.56 | 19.82 ± 4.43 | 46.76 ± 10.06 | 7.09 ± 4.21 | 2.68 ± 1.53 | 2.09 ± 1.45 | 11.87 ± 6.45 | 33.56 ± 5.70 | 25.47 ± 4.38 | 59.04 ± 9.33 | |
|
p: 0.000 KWX2: 56.664 |
p: 0.019 KWX2: 9.941 |
p: 0.322 KWX2: 3.491 |
p: 0.000 KWX2: 35.048 |
p: 0.004 KWX2: 13.125 |
p: 0.009 KWX2: 11.460 |
p: 0.084 KWX2: 6.635 |
p: 0.003 KWX2: 13.652 |
p: 0.915 KWX2: 0.515 |
p: 0.087 KWX2: 6.577 |
p: 0.314 KWX2: 3.549 |
||
| Feeling burned out | Yes | 24.45 ± 6.83 | 8.56 ± 3.78 | 19.36 ± 4.12 | 52.38 ± 10.06 | 8.89 ± 4.70 | 3.28 ± 1.68 | 2.36 ± 1.58 | 14.54 ± 7.09 | 33.47 ± 6.85 | 24.63 ± 4.79 | 58.10 ± |
| Mostly | 22.28 ± 5.21 | 7.60 ± 3.09 | 20.18 ± 4.25 | 50.08 ± 8.34 | 7.75 ± 4.21 | 2.93 ± 1.62 | 2.45 ± 1.51 | 13.14 ± 6.67 | 33.78 ± 5.35 | 26.48 ± 4.47 | 60.27 ± 8.90 | |
| Sometimes | 16.09 ± 4.72 | 6.87 ± 3.51 | 19.75 ± 4.19 | 42.71 ± 7.63 | 6.01 ± 3.52 | 2.35 ± 1.25 | 1.87 ± 1.30 | 10.23 ± 5.32 | 33.39 ± 4.86 | 25.19 ± 3.32 | 58.59 ± 7.60 | |
| No | 13.72 ± 8.02 | 7.25 ± 3.98 | 20.00 ± 5.81 | 40.97 ± 11.52 | 5.55 ± 3.76 | 2.02 ± 1.27 | 1.47 ± 1.15 | 9.05 ± 5.34 | 33.69 ± 6.48 | 25.44 ± 5.51 | 59.13 ± 11.28 | |
| Total | 19.42 ± 7.15 | 7.51 ± 3.56 | 19.82 ± 4.43 | 46.76 ± 10.06 | 7.09 ± 4.21 | 2.68 ± 1.53 | 2.09 ± 1.45 | 11.87 ± 6.45 | 33.56 ± 5.70 | 25.47 ± 4.38 | 59.04 ± 9.33 | |
|
p: 0,000 KWX2: 86.639 |
p: 0.093 KWX2: 6.424 |
p: 0.593 KWX2: 1.900 |
p: 0.000 KWX2: 60.660 |
p: 0.000 KWX2: 22.813 |
p: 0.000 KWX2: 18.879 |
p: 0.002 KWX2: 14.790 |
p: 0.000 KWX2: 26.715 |
p: 0.794 KWX2: 1.029 |
p: 0.045 KWX2: 8.069 |
p: 0.372 KWX2: 3.312 |
||
| Skipping meals | Yes | 21.00 ± 7.31 | 8.02 ± 3.74 | 19.73 ± 4.33 | 48.76 ± 10.12 | 7.82 ± 4.48 | 2.90 ± 1.56 | 2.29 ± 1.52 | 13.02 ± 6.96 | 33.48 ± 5.53 | 25.37 ± 4.14 | 58.85 ± 9.04 |
| No | 17.66 ± 6.56 | 6.95 ± 3.29 | 19.93 ± 4.56 | 44.56 ± 9.56 | 6.28 ± 3.74 | 2.43 ± 1.45 | 1.88 ± 1.34 | 10.61 ± 5.59 | 33.66 ± 5.90 | 25.59 ± 4.66 | 59.25 ± 9.66 | |
|
p: 0.000 U: 5949,000 Z: 3.676 |
p: 0.026 U: 6807,000 Z: 2.222 |
p: 0.673 U: 7860,000 Z: 0.422 |
p: 0.001 U: 6181,000 Z: 3.282 |
p: 0.005 U: 6466,500 Z: 2.805 |
p: 0.009 U: 6607,500 Z: 2.620 |
p: 0.077 U: 7090,000 Z: 1.770 |
p: 0.006 U: 6479,500 Z: 2.776 |
p: 0.543 U: 7750,500 Z: 0.609 |
p: 0.503 U: 7715,000 Z: 0.670 |
p: 0.471 U: 7684,000 Z: 0.721 |
||
| Thinking that emotional changes affect eating | Yes | 19.89 ± 7.07 | 7.45 ± 3.56 | 20.41 ± 4.01 | 47.76 ± 9.64 | 7.38 ± 4.41 | 2.86 ± 1.51 | 2.26 ± 1.49 | 12.51 ± 6.68 | 33.93 ± 5.50 | 26.12 ± 4.38 | 60.06 ± 9.18 |
| No | 17.88 ± 7.23 | 7.73 ± 3.59 | 17.91 ± 5.18 | 43.53 ± 10.81 | 6.16 ± 3.37 | 2.08 ± 1.44 | 1.56 ± 1.15 | 9.81 ± 5.18 | 32.36 ± 6.20 | 23.36 ± 3.73 | 55.73 ± 9.10 | |
|
p: 0.035 U: 4796,500 Z: 2.113 |
p: 0.365 U: 5399,500 Z: 0.906 |
p: 0.000 U: 4034,500 Z: 3.653 |
p: 0.004 U: 4423,500 Z: 2.861 |
p: 0.119 U: 5075,000 Z: 1.560 |
p: 0.000 U: 4073,500 Z: 3.654 |
p: 0.002 U: 4300,500 Z: 3.174 |
p: 0.010 U: 4567,000 Z: 2.576 |
p: 0.077 U: 4971,000 Z: 1.767 |
p: 0.000 U: 3628,000 Z: 4.470 |
p: 0.001 U: 4248,500 Z: 3.213 |
||
A positive relationship was found between JPS and MBI (P = 0.001) and JPS and EEQ (P > 0.05). On the other hand, a positive relationship was found between MBI and EEQ (P = 0.001) presented in Table 5.
Table 5.
Correlation Analysis Between Maslach Burnout Inventory, Emotional Eater Questionnaire and Job Performance Scale.
| Scales | Emotional Exhaustion | Depersonalization | Personal Accomplishment | MBI Total | Disinhibition | Type of Food | Guilt | EEQ Total | Task Performance | Contextual Performance | JPS Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emotional exhaustion | 1 | 0.412* | 0.095 | 0.907* | 0.362* | 0.277* | 0.290* | 0.381* | 0.097 | 0.021 | 0.061 |
| Depersonalization | 1 | −0.324* | 0.482* | 0.205* | 0.170* | 0.205* | 0.231* | −0.222* | −0.270* | −0.250* | |
| Personal accomplishment | 1 | 0.349** | −0.010 | 0.075 | 0.033 | 0.028 | 0.587** | 0.586** | 0.634** | ||
| MBI total | 1 | 0.320* | 0.286* | 0.299* | 0.362* | 0.219* | 0.161* | 0.206* | |||
| Disinhibition | 1 | 0.592* | 0.641* | 0.941* | 0.029 | 0.099 | 0.067 | ||||
| Type of food | 1 | 0.511* | 0.755* | 0.146** | 0.183* | 0.159** | |||||
| Guilt | 1 | 0.781* | 0.021 | 0.147* | 0.087 | ||||||
| EEQ total | 1 | 0.077 | 0.140** | 0.112 | |||||||
| Task performance | 1 | 0.665* | 0.911* | ||||||||
| Contextual performance | 1 | 0.894* | |||||||||
| JPS total | 1 |
*P < 0.001, **P < 0.05.
Discussion
Burnout is the exhaustion of energy, scepticism towards work, and reduced professional effectiveness that occur as a result of chronic job stress. Factors such as excessive workload, lack of personnel, feelings of inadequacy, lack of reward mechanisms and poor working environment increase the risk of burnout among nurses. 18 Chronic stress affects the amount and type of food intake, leading to both overeating and undereating and the development of chronic diseases. 19 Thus, burnout can reduce the work efficiency of nurses by increasing the tendency to emotional eating.
In this study, the emotional exhaustion and MBI total scores were higher in women (P < 0.05). Yıldırım et al. (2023) found that men had higher mean scores on the MBI and its subscales, with a significant relationship between MBI depersonalization and gender. 20 In the study by Camci and Kavuran (2021), the mean score of men was higher on the MBI, 21 while in the study conducted by Akyüz et al. (2015), the mean score of women was higher on the MBI and its subscales. 22 We believe that the different results of this study compared to the literature are due to the fact that burnout is affected by the institution, working hours and team.
In this study, nurses with low income had higher mean scores on the MBI emotional exhaustion and depersonalization and MBI total and EEQ and subscales (P < 0.05). In the study conducted by Gezginci and Öztaş (2021), the scores of nurses with low income were higher in all subscales of the MBI. 23 In the study conducted by Akyüz (2015), emotional exhaustion and depersonalization scores are higher in those with insufficient monthly income levels. 22 Ünal and Ayyıldız (2023) found that the mean score of MBI depersonalization was higher in nurses whose income was less than their expenses. 24 An individual’s food preferences are shaped by the person’s taste, health, social status, income, personal and social factors, religious beliefs, eating and drinking habits, living environment and other psychological factors. 25 Therefore, the tendency to emotional eating may affect low-income nurses more. According to the related literature, lower income may increase the level of burnout. In this study, the mean scores of nurses with income equal to expenses were higher in JPS total score and its subscales (P < 0.05). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation sources are used to increase job satisfaction and improve performance, and low salary is a precursor to job dissatisfaction. 26 Factors such as insufficient income, not being promoted or problems with promotion, not being given fringe benefits, not being given training opportunities and not being rewarded, and poor working conditions have a negative impact both job satisfaction and performance. 27 Therefore, income level may affect nurses’ motivation and commitment to work.
In this study, the mean scores of nurses who did not have children were higher on the EEQ and subscales (P < 0.05). Parents project their own values, expectations and goals to their children directly or indirectly while shaping their children’s eating habits. This may affect the child’s nutritional preferences, energy intake, food relationship and weight status. Therefore, understanding parents’ feelings, thoughts, and approaches towards eating plays an important role in evaluating children’s eating attitudes. 28 Thus, nurses may experience stress due to the responsibilities of having children and may consequently exhibit emotional eating behaviour.
In this study, nurses working in services had a higher mean MBI score in the emotional exhaustion, those working in the intensive care unit had a higher mean MBI depersonalization score, and those working in paediatric emergency had a higher mean MBI Personal Accomplishment score. In the study conducted by Camci and Kavuran (2021), the mean MBI score of nurses working in the inpatient service was higher. 21 Uzun and Mayda (2020), found that nurses working in internal clinics had higher mean scores in MBI emotional exhaustion and MBI depersonalization, and those working in the emergency department had higher mean scores in MBI personal achievement. 29 Ramírez-Elvira et al. (2021) found that intense workload, seniority and age were the main factors associated with burnout syndrome in intensive care nurses. 30 Although different departments were analyzed, the burnout and depression rates increased as experience increased, especially in intensive care nurses. 31 It is thought that the results related to the units vary in countries and regions due to the differences in nursing professional functioning, patient profiles and hospital systems.
In this study, nurses who worked between 1 and 5 years had higher mean scores on the MBI and subscales (P < 0.05). Camci and Kavuran (2021) found that the mean score of the MBI was higher in nurses who worked 12 years and longer. 21 Uzun and Mayda (2020) found that the nurses who worked between 1 and 5 years had higher mean scores on the depersonalization. 29 Age is associated with psychophysical exhaustion and a sense of professional inadequacy aspects of burnout. 32 Factors such as less intensive care unit experience, being single and being younger are among the factors that increase the level of burnout. On the other hand, as the number of years worked in the intensive care unit increases, the level of personal success also increases. 30 Nurses with more years in the profession and older age have lower burnout and higher job satisfaction, while for younger nurses, the friendly relationships established with patients may cause frustration and fatigue later on, leading to burnout. 32 Although nurses’ personal factors affect the time they encounter burnout, they may suffer from burnout at any time, with responsibilities, work hours and intensive work pace apparently having an effect.
In this study, the mean scores of nurses who were dissatisfied with their work were higher in the EEQ disinhibition, the EEQ type of food, and the EEQ total score (P < 0.05). An individual’s satisfaction with the service they provide at an enterprise or institution is directly proportional to their job or position within the organization. 33 There is a view that emotional consumers prefer this habitual and compulsive consumption to cope with negative emotions. 34 It is believed that nurses who are dissatisfied with their job exhibit emotional eating behaviours due to this stress and resort to food as a means to achieve satisfaction in relation to their work.
In this study, the mean scores of nurses who felt burnout were higher in the MBI emotional exhaustion, the MBI depersonalization, and the total score of the MBI (P < 0.05). In the study conducted by Yıldırım et al. (2023), the mean scores in the MBI depersonalization and the MBI personal accomplishment were higher in nurses who felt burnout. 20 Similarly, Özçetin et al. (2019), found that the mean scores of MBI and its subscales of oncology nurses who felt exhausted were high. 35 Nurses’ feeling emotionally exhausted, depersonalization towards colleagues and the work environment, and increased feelings of personal failure are defined in the literature as processes of coping with difficulties at work. 36 Nurses may experience feelings of burnout more frequently as their monthly working hours increase and their professional motivation decreases.
In his study, the mean scores of nurses who felt burnout were high on the EEQ disinhibition, the EEQ type of food, and the EEQ total score. Additionally, the mean scores were high in the EEQ guilt, the JPS, and its subscales among nurses who mostly felt burnout. Nurses who feel professional burnout may develop a lack of motivation, negative self-esteem, inadequate team relationships, an inability to allocate time to patients, less empathy with them, and a sense of powerlessness. 32 Feeling burnout may cause emotional eating behaviours in nurses, potentially affecting their job satisfaction and performance.
In this study, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, MBI, EEQ and its subscales were higher in nurses with meal-skipping behaviour (p < 0.05). A stressful work environment and long shift system cause nurses to feel excessively tired, and since time and energy are limited, they may prefer snacking instead of preparing healthy meals. 37 Burnout can occur when nurses skip meals for reasons such as shift work and working long hours, and when they do not have enough energy because they do not get enough food. Skipping meals increases emotional eating behaviour. Nurses may skip meals because of working in shifts, exposure to work stress and poor hospital food, and this may lead nurses to emotional eating behaviour.
In this study, nurses who thought their emotional changes affected their nutritional status had higher mean scores on the MBI and its subscales, the EEQ and its subscales, the JPS and its subscales (P < 0.05). Negative emotions that are stated to affect eating behaviour are generally anxiety, sadness, loneliness, worry, anger, stress and depression. 38 Factors such as emotional changes, especially stress or emotional disorders, can affect eating behaviour. Changes in eating habits may be related to a person’s emotional state, which may increase burnout. Besides, emotional eating habits and burnout levels may also negatively affect job performance.
A positive relationship was found between the JPS, MBI and EEQ. In the study conducted by Asar and Ocak (2021), a positive relationship was found between MBI depersonalization and JPS task performance. 39 Ayalew and Workineh (2019) found that recognition increases nurses’ motivation, which in turn increases job satisfaction. 27 According to Altınbay (2021), there is a negative relationship between burnout and job performance. 40 Therefore, increased depersonalization will mean reduced job performance, and it can be concluded that reduced work motivation and decreased job interest and satisfaction due to depersonalization can negatively affect job performance.
Limitations
The study’s limitations include being conducted in a single hospital and, therefore, not being generalizable. Another limitation is that the heavy workload and shift work schedule resulted in nurses being unwilling to participate in the study.
Conclusion
It was observed that emotional eating behaviour was present among nurses aged 21-26 who participated in the study, that burnout was more prevalent among women, and that this situation affected their emotional eating and job performance. Burnout was also found to be more common among nurses whose income was less than their expenses, leading to emotional eating behaviour. Changes in emotional states were found to affect burnout, emotional eating behaviour, and job performance. Additionally, it was concluded that Emotional Exhaustion significantly influenced emotional eating and job performance and that job performance decreased as depersonalization increased. To eliminate or prevent burnout in nurses, it is necessary to provide support and psychological support as necessary, identify nurses’ abilities to cope with stress and burnout and provide training based on the deficiencies identified. Planning activities to improve nurses’ job performance and motivation and establishing regular breaks and rest periods is recommended.
Burnout factors need to be eliminated so that nurses can work more willingly and more efficiently in the work environment and at the same time protect their physical and mental health. In addition, the duties and responsibilities of nurses need to be clarified in clinics to prevent and reduce burnout. While nurses meet the needs of the patient/healthy individual, processes in the work environment can negatively affect nurses emotionally and physically, which is reflected in job performance and patient care. Negative emotions, intense work tempo, and shift work can also cause burnout in nurses, which can lead to emotional eating and negatively affect the healthy nutrition processes of nurses.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank all the nurses who agreed to participate
Footnotes
Author Contributions: All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Study design: ES, GK, Data collection: ES, Data analysis: ES, GK, Study supervision: GK, Manuscript writing: ES, GK, Critical revisions for important intellectual content: GK.
Author’s Note: This study was presented as a master’s thesis by Erhan Sert, under the supervision of Assistant Professor Gülcan Kendirkıran, at Arel University Graduate Education Institute, Department of Nursing.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical Statement
Ethical Approval
The study was conducted following the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. Permission was obtained from the ethics committee of Arel University (Date: 26.05.2023 / No: 2023/11) to evaluate the ethical suitability of the research. Permission was obtained from the owners of the instruments to use them in the study. Institutional permission (Date: 15.08.2023 / No: 2023/12) was obtained from ‘İstanbul Haseki Training and Research Hospital’. The purpose of the study was explained to the nurses currently working at ‘İstanbul Haseki Training and Research Hospital’, and their written consent was obtained with a voluntary consent form to participate in the study in line with the principle of voluntariness.
ORCID iD
Gülcan KENDİRKIRAN https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3243-9590
References
- 1.Edú-Valsania S, Laguía A, Moriano JA. Burnout: a review of theory and measurement. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2022;19(3):1780. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zare S, Kazemi R, Izadi A, Smith A. Beyond the outbreak of COVID-19: factors affecting burnout in nurses in Iran. Annals of Global Health. 2021;87(1):51. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gesner E, Dykes PC, Zhang L, Gazarian P. Documentation burden in nursing and ıts role in clinician burnout syndrome. Appl Clin Inform. 2022;13(5):983-990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rabenu E, Shkoler O, Lebron MJ, Tabak F. Heavy-work investment, job engagement, managerial role, person-organization value congruence, and burnout: a moderated-mediation analysis in USA and Israel. Curr Psychol. 2021;40:4825-4842. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dima G, Meseșan Schmitz L, Șimon M-C. Job stress and burnout among social workers in the VUCA World of COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability. 2021;13(13):7109. doi: 10.3390/su13137109 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.De Hert S. Burnout in healthcare workers: prevalence, impact and preventative strategies. Local Reg Anesth. 2020;13:171-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grajek M, Krupa-Kotara K, Białek-Dratwa A, et al. Prevalence of emotional eating in groups of students with varied diets and physical activity in Poland. Nutrients. 2022;14(16):3289. doi: 10.3390/nu14163289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dakanalis A, Mentzelou M, Papadopoulou SK, et al. The association of emotional eating with overweight/obesity, depression, anxiety/stress, and dietary patterns: a review of the current clinical evidence. Nutrients. 2023;15(5):1173. doi: 10.3390/nu15051173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schnepper R, Georgii C, Eichin K, et al. Fight, flight,–or grab a bite! trait emotional and restrained eating style predicts food cue responding under negative emotions. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2020;14:91. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Leary MR. Emotional responses to interpersonal rejection. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2022;17(4):435-441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ekingen E. The effect of organizational justice on job performance and the mediating role of job satisfaction: a study on nurses. Hosp Top. 2023;101(2):103-112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen FL, Chen KC, Chiou SY, Chenü PY, Du ML, Tung TH. The longitudinal study for the work-related factors to job performance among nurses in emergency department. Medicine. 2019;98(12):e14950. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Olajide AO, Sowunmi CO, Adeleke BO. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing job satisfaction among nurses working in two selected government owned hospital in Lagos. Nigeria. Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research. 2020;8(4):488-501. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Srivastava S, Agrawal S. Resistance to change and turnover intention: a moderated mediation model of burnout and perceived organizational support. J Organ Change Manag. 2020;33(7):1431-1447. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ergin C. Burnout in doctors and nurses and adaptation of the Maslach burnout scale. In: VII. National Psychology Congress Scientific Studies. Ankara: Turkish Psychologists Association Publications; 1992:143-154. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Arslantaş H, Dereboy F, Yüksel R, İnalkaç S. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the emotional eater Questionnaire (EEQ-TR). Turkish Journal of Psychiatry. 2020;31(2):122. doi: 10.5080/u23520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bağcı Z. The effect of job satisfaction of employee on task and contextual performance. Journal of Management and Economics Research. 2014;12(24):58-72. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD, Johnson PO, Johnson LA, Satele D, West CP. A cross-sectional study exploring the relationship between burnout, absenteeism, and job performance among American nurses. BMC Nurs. 2019;18(1):1-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Esquivel MK. Nutrition strategies for reducing risk of burnout among physicians and health care professionals. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021;15(2):126-129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yıldırım ÖD, Sıvacı R, Taşdemir BB, Baki ED. The relationship of burnout level with sociodemographic variables in health personnel working in intensive care unit. Kocatepe Medical Journal. 2023;24:154-160. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Camci G, Kavuran E. Determination of the correlation of job stress and burnout levels of nurses with their job and life satisfaction levels. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences. 2021;24(2):274-283. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Akyüz İ. Investigation of level of nurses’ burnout and depression in terms of working conditions and demographic characteristics. Journal of Business and Economics Studies. 2015;3(1):21-34. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gezginci E, Öztaş B. Investigation of the relationship between burnout and innovation levels of nurses working in surgical units. Hacettepe Journal of Health Administration. 2021;24(2):361-374. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ünal D, Ayyıldız T. Determination of the relationship between the humorous styles and burnout levels of nurses working in pediatric clinics. Uluborlu Journal of Vocational Sciences. 2023;6(1):57-70. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yıldız E. Bibliometric analysis of national studies on food neophobia and food neophilia. Journal of Erciyes Akademi. 2022;36(3):1006-1024. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ayalew F, Kibwana S, Shawula S, et al. Understanding job satisfaction and motivation among nurses in public health facilities of Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2019;18:46. doi: 10.1186/s12912-019-0373-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ayalew E, Workineh Y. Job satisfaction and associated factors among nurses in Bahir Dar city administrative, North West Ethiopia, 2017. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4363-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Çağlayan Ural P, Andaç Öztürk S. The effect of mothers' emotional eating, cognitive restriction and uncontrolled eating behaviors on children's food consumption. Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Journal of Health Sciences. 2021;1(3):151-162. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Uzun LN, Mayda AS. Investigation of burnout levels in nurses according to different variables: example of a universty hospital. Konuralp Med J. 2020;12(1):137-143. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ramírez-Elvira S, Romero-Béjar JL, Suleiman-Martos N, Gómez-Urquiza JL, Monsalve-Reyes C, Albendín-García L. Prevalence, risk factors and burnout levels in ıntensive care unit nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2021;18(21):11432. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen C, Meier ST. Burnout and depression in nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;124:104099. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jarosz K, Zborowska A, Młynarska A. Rationing care, job satisfaction, fatigue and the level of professional burnout of nurses in urology departments. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2022;19(14):8625. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kaplan A, Bezirgan M. Determination of the impact of empowerment in catering firms on staff satisfaction, corporate loyalty and corporate image. Journal of Business Research-Turk. 2020;12(1):413-428. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chang Y. Effects of game situation-dependent emotions on sport spectators’ food craving. Front Psychol. 2021;12:724220. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.YSÜ Ö, Sarıoğlu G, Dursun Sİ. Resilience, burnout and psychological well-being levels of oncology nurses. Curr Approaches Psychiatry. 2019;11:147-164. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Çelik Y, Kılıç İ. The relationships between job satisfaction, professional burnout and quality of life in nurses. Kocatepe Medical Journal. 2019;20(4):230-238. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Williams SG, Fruh S, Barinas JL, Graves RJ. Self-care in nurses. J Radiol Nurs. 2022;41(1):22-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fuente González CE, Chávez-Servín JL, de la Torre-Carbot K, Ronquillo González D, Aguilera Barreiro MLÁ, Ojeda Navarro LR. Relationship between emotional eating, consumption of hyperpalatable energy-dense foods, and indicators of nutritional status: a Systematic Review. Journal of Obesity. 2022;2022:4243868. doi: 10.1155/2022/4243868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Asar E, Ocak M. An empirical research on the effect of health workers’ job engagement on their job performance and burnout levels. Toros University FEASS Journal of Social Sciences. 2021;8(14):36-50. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Altınbay A. The effect of burnout on job performance of women free accountants financial consultants: the case of Kütahya and Eskişehir. Journal of Social Policy Studies. 2021;21(52):669-688. [Google Scholar]