Table 5. Comparison of the correlation coefficient and SelectKBest scores based on the features.
Comparison of features used.
| Feature types | Features used (Krishnamoorthy, 2015) | Features used (this research) |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistic | State Verb, State Action Verb, Interpretive Action Verb, Descriptive Action Verb, Adjective | Interpretive Action Verb, Noun, Adverb, Adjective, Review Length, Capitalized Words, Sentences in a Review |
| Metadata | Reviewing Date, Product Release Date | Review Name Existence, Review Location Existence, Rating |
| Readability | Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, SMOG Index, Gunning Fog Index, Automated Readability Index, Coleman-Liau | – |
| Subjectivity | Subjectivity Score | Subjectivity Score |
| Polarity | – | Polarity Score |
Notes.
The bold values reflect the differences between the features employed in this research compared to previous research (Krishnamoorthy, 2015).