Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 12.
Published in final edited form as: Demogr Res. 2024 May 7;50:929–966. doi: 10.4054/demres.2024.50.32
Log odds SE BH p-values

Intercept −5.78 0.19 < 0.01
Child-level variables
1. Dead in wave 1 (ref: alive in wave 1) 5.18 0.11 < 0.01
2. Female (ref: Male) 1.12 0.09 < 0.01
3. Age (actual or purported) at wave 2 (scaled) 1.04 0.05 < 0.01
Mother-level variables
4. Age (at Wave2; scaled) −0.11 0.04 0.01
5. Years of education (scaled) −0.20 0.05 < 0.01
6. Any difficulty conveying IW purpose (Ref: No) 0.26 0.11 0.03
7. Did R have difficulty understanding questions? 0.01 0.10 0.95
8. Was R confident? (Ref: Usually)
 Sometimes 0.13 0.07 0.11
 Rarely 0.45 0.11 < 0.01
Household (HH) variables
9. Rural (ref: Urban) −0.20 0.06 < 0.01
10. Religion-Caste (Ref: Hindu - Upper caste)
 Adivasi 0.14 0.10 0.21
 Dalit −0.25 0.08 < 0.01
 Muslim −0.18 0.10 0.08
 Other Backward Castes (OBC) −0.13 0.08 0.11
 Other religions −0.12 0.21 0.61
11. Asset-ownership (ref: Q5, richest)
 Quintile 1 (poorest) 0.33 0.11 < 0.01
 Quintile 2 0.40 0.11 < 0.01
 Quintile 3 0.23 0.10 0.02
 Quintile 4 0.11 0.09 0.25
12. Multiple Eligible Women in the HH 0.02 0.06 0.77
Interviewer-level variables
13. Workload (scaled) −0.36 0.08 < 0.01
14. IW sequence (scaled) 0.09 0.04 0.03
15. Missing any age-at-death in wave 2 0.15 0.12 0.25
Interactions
16. Child reported dead in wave 1 × Female child −1.09 0.11 < 0.01
17. Mother’s education (years, scaled) × Child reported dead in wave 1 0.26 0.06 < 0.01
18. Child reported dead in wave 1 × Child’s age (scaled; wave 2) −1.06 0.05 < 0.01
19. Interviewer’s workload (scaled) × Child reported dead in wave 1 0.18 0.06 < 0.01