Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 20;29:101350. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101350

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Characterization of the DAM hydrogel. (A). Representative HE staining, DAPI staining, oil red O staining, and Masson staining images of AT and DAM, scale bar, 100 μm. (B). DNA agarose gel electrophoresis. (C). The residual DNA quantification in AT and DAM,∗∗p < 0.01 Vs. AT; n = 3. (D). DAM power. (E). DAM hydrogel. (F). The gel effect of DAM hydrogel in vitro. (G). Scanning electron micrograph of DAM hydrogel, scale bar, 100 μm. (H). The protein composition analysis of DAM hydrogel and collagen I hydrogel. (I)Turbidimetric gelation kinetic of DAM hydrogel. (J). The curves of DAM hydrogel in the storage modulus (G′) and the loss modulus(G″) after inducing gelation. (K). FTIR spectra of DAM hydrogel. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)