Table 10.

Incomes and related disparities of forensic psychologists by gender.

	Overall	Clinical				Non-clinical
		Overall	Professional setting
			Institution only	Institution/private practice	Private practice only
Overall
Women	106 [85–135]	106 [86–135]	100 [81–114]	130 [100–149]	130 [100–172]	108 [79–143]
Men	160 [115–241]	160 [116–244]	101 [84–140]	175 [125–218]	223 [150–350]	163 [69–310]
Disparity	0.66	0.66	0.99	0.74	0.58	0.66
Forensic psychology
Women	94 [70–110]	95 [73–113]	86 [70–105]	103 [94–138]	90 [35–135]	70 [35–99]
Men	135 [90–200]	135 [91–201]	91 [75–136]	160 [110–211]	150 [95–280]	150 [59–190]
Disparity	0.70	0.70	0.95	0.64	0.60	0.47
Other psychology
Women	50 [17–82]	50 [17–82]	30 [6–78]	34 [7–70]	62 [37–90]	46 [38–96]
Men	41 [13–75]	41 [13–75]	15 [10–43]	41 [16–59]	63 [22–120]	†
Disparity	1.22	1.22	2.00	0.83	0.98	†
Other
Women	55 [9–106]	20 [8–108]	20 [7–121]	†	†	†
Men	6 [5–20]	6 [5–20]	†		6 [6–34]
Disparity	9.17	3.33	†	†	†	†

All values presented as Mdn [interquartile range] in thousands of USD rounded from participants' pooled responses. Sample sizes include all eligible participants who reported working at least fulltime (i.e., 35 h per week or more) in the overall (n = 346), clinical (n = 280), and non-clinical samples (n = 29). Professional Setting further includes clinical participants working in institutional settings only (n = 113), both institutional settings and private practice (n = 80), or private practice only (n = 86). Actual sample sizes reduced due to item non-response. Gender grouping based on binary gender identity variable (i.e., female or male, with additional “I prefer not to respond to this item”); results did not differ when compared to individual response options (i.e., woman/female and man/male, among other options). Disparity was determined by dividing median values for women by median values for men, and therefore represent relative differences standardized on a 1.00 scale.

^†Data not provided due to limited sample size.