Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 13;29(1):e4771. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4771

TABLE 2.

Linear regression models associations between quantitative sensory tests and measures of fibromyalgia disease burden and symptoms.

PPT (β (95% CI)) TS (β (95% CI)) CPM (β (95% CI))
Dependent variables
Polysymptomatic Distress scale
PDS −0.4 (−1.1, 0.3) 0.1 (−0.6, 0.8) 3.5 (−1.1, 8.0)
SSS −0.2 (−0.5, 0.1) 0.2 (−0.0, 0.5) −0.1 (−1.9, 1.6)
WSP −0.2 (−0.8, 0.3) −0.1 (−0.7, 0.4) 3.6 (−0.0, 7.2)
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
FIQ total −2.1 (−4.3, −0.0)* 1.5 (−0.6, 3.7) 0.7 (−14.3, 15.6)
Pain −0.2 (−0.5, 0.1) 0.1 (−0.2, 0.4) 1.2 (−0.6, 3.1)
Fatigue −0.2 (−0.5, 0.0) 0.0 (−0.2, 0.3) −0.2 (−1.7, 1.3)
Stiffness −0.2 (−0.5, 0.2) 0.1 (−0.2, 0.4) 0.8 (−1.2, 2.9)
Anxiety −0.3 (−0.7, 0.1) 0.3 (−0.1, 0.7) 0.8 (−1.8, 3.4)
Depression −0.4 (−0.8, 0.0) 0.5 (0.1, 0.9)* 0.1 (−2.8, 3.1)
Function −0.4 (−0.7, −0.0)* 0.1 (−0.3, 0.4) 1.5 (−0.9, 3.8)

Note: Linear regression models adjusted for age, gender and body mass index. R 2 adjusted <0.1 is not coloured. R 2 adjusted > = 0.1 and <0.2. R 2 adjusted > = 0.2 and <0.3.

Abbreviations: DIP, distal interphalangeal joint; DRUJ, dorsal radio‐ulnar joint; PDS, polysymptomatic distress scale; PPT, Pressure pain threshold (lower values reflect greater pain sensitization); SSS, symptom severity score; tib ant, tibialis anterior muscle; WSP, widespread pain. All were statistically insignificant after corrections.

*

p < 0.05 prior to Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons.