Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 19;111(12):2789–2798. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.10.018

Table 2.

Independent GWAS hits and their representative variants identified by either the additive or the recessive model

SNPID (rsid) Most severe consequence Locus AF cases AF controls OR (95% CI) p value Fin enrichmenta Known associationsb
Recessive

chr8_109459837_G_C (rs17368310)c,d splice donor variant PKHD1L1 0.077 0.067 2.34 (1.98–2.78) 1.47 × 10−22 1.42 female infertility
chr14_55424219_T_A (rs144313315)e stop gained TBPL2 0.013 0.012 650.1 (190.7–2216.1) 4.11 × 10−25 43.04

Additive

chr1_22139327_T_C (rs61768001) intron variant WNT4 0.167 0.155 1.1 (1.07–1.13) 4.4 × 10−12 0.99 endometriosis, fibroids
chr4_69718365_T_G (rs13138435) downstream gene variant SULT1B1 0.299 0.313 0.93 (0.91–0.95) 4.57 × 10−10 0.8 uterine leiomyomata and fibroids
chr6_152241136_C_G (rs58415480) intron variant ESR1 0.246 0.231 1.08 (1.06–1.11) 2.69 × 10−11 1.59 endometriosis
chr6_151230382_G_T (rs35977392) upstream gene variant ESR1 0.340 0.354 0.93 (0.91–0.95) 3.97 × 10−11 0.88 endometriosis
chr8_109459837_G_C (rs17368310) splice donor variant PKHD1L1 0.077 0.067 1.19 (1.14–1.23) 3.79 × 10−18 1.42 female infertility

The lead variant from the recessive and the additive models at the shared locus (PKHD1L1) are within the same credible set (linkage disequilibrium [LD] = 1). CI, confidence interval.

a

Compared to non-Finnish Europeans in gnomAD v.3.15

b

Known associations at the gene level have been defined from NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog16 and previous publications for female infertility and underlying disorders.

c

Representative variant was changed to coding variant from lead variant chr8_109515401_CAAT_C (rs58870933), r2 = 1.

d

c.7246+1G>C (GenBank: NM_177531.6).

e

c.895A>T (GenBank: NM_199047.3) (p.Arg299Ter).