Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 25;14(23):2656. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232656

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Results of the quality indicator (QI) rating process (n = 11 panelists). (A) Distribution of the panelists’ median ratings for each of the 36 proposed QIs in Round 1, with most indicators receiving a median score of 9 points. (B) Distribution of the panelists’ median ratings for each of the 36 QIs in Round 2, which confirmed that all indicators met the criteria (median score ≥ 7 points) and were validated as the final set of QIs for PAH management in Japan.