Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 21;15(12):6905–6921. doi: 10.1364/BOE.541655

Table 2. Comparison with state-of-the-art 2D and 3D methods on DME dataset.

Methods Metrics
DSC(%)↑ Jaccard(%) 95HD ASD
UNet [10] (2D) 78.05 ± 6.42 64.46 ± 8.84 3.61 ± 1.13 1.01 ± 0.52
UNet [33] (3D) 88.04 ± 1.54 78.68 ± 2.47 1.82 ± 0.61 0.62 ± 0.28
ResNet34[34] (3D) 89.51 ± 0.78 79.33 ± 1.51 1.41 ± 0.44 0.63 ± 0.32
UNet++[11] (2D) 81.46 ± 6.37 69.84 ± 4.12 2.03 ± 0.81 0.98 ± 0.51
RetifluidNet [19] (2D) 82.07 ± 4.07 69.79 ± 5.89 2.24 ± 0.85 0.96 ± 0.44
UNERT [27] (3D) 85.79 ± 2.81 73.22 ± 3.82 1.97 ± 0.81 0.78 ± 0.42
Swin UNETR [28] (3D) 87.14 ± 1.96 75.92 ± 3.05 1.88 ± 0.75 0.67 ± 0.36
Ours 91.04 ± 0.24 81.93 ± 0.24 1.38 ± 0.29 0.56 ± 0.27