Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 1;14(23):3470. doi: 10.3390/ani14233470

Table 5.

Cecal microbial abundance at the OTU level in laying hens.

Estimators BDG CDG p Value
ACE 478.37 ± 21.47 447.27 ± 28.03 0.4469
Chao 485.63 ± 18.98 455.06 ± 26.58 0.4131
Coverage 0.99699 ± 0.00 0.99652 ± 0.00 0.1806
Shannon 4.607 ± 0.15 4.3148 ± 0.13 0.2271
Simpson 0.032655 ± 0.01 0.037817 ± 0.01 0.6769
Sobs 448.67 ± 20.90 406.67 ± 29.10 0.3172

Note: This table presents the estimated microbial abundance within the cecal microbiome of laying hens in the BDG and CDG groups. The estimators used included ACE (abundant coverage estimator), Chao (Chao richness estimator), coverage (proportion of species observed), Shannon (Shannon diversity index), Simpson (Simpson’s diversity index), and Sobs (species observed). p > 0.05 indicates that the difference between groups was not significant.