Table 13. Comparison of GN-BiLSTM with other state-of-the art work on same dataset.
| Reference | Technique | Validation | Malware | Category | Family |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roy et al. (2023) | ML: Stacked ensemble | 4-K cross-validation | 99.98% | 85.04% | 70.29% |
| Abualhaj et al. (2024) | ML: KNN | – | 99.97% | 82.21% | 66.93% |
| Mezina & Burget (2022) | DL: Dilated CNN | – | 99% | – | 83% |
| Roy & Chen (2021) | DL: TF-IDF | – | 99.87% | – | 96.5% |
| Shafin et al. (2023) | – | – | 99.96% | 84.56% | 72.60% |
| Proposed GN-BiLSTM | DL: Feature engineering & SMOTE | K-Fold Cross-validation | 99.99% | 85.48% | 74.68% |