Table 1 ∣.
Step | Problem | Possible reason | Solution |
---|---|---|---|
2 | No guide with high efficiency or low off-target scores | Selected region contains repetitive elements | Use RepeatMasker to avoid repetitive elements. Change coordinates (1 kb upstream or downstream) |
9 | Low DNA concentration | Not enough template or inefficient PCR | Repeat PCR with more plasmid template or pool multiple reactions |
12 | Smear or no band in gel | sgRNA degradation | Repeat reaction and ensure nuclease-free conditions |
14 | Low sgRNA concentration | Poor in vitro transcription | Repeat reaction with more DNA template or pool multiple reactions |
19 | No amplification of donor DNA | Not sufficient template | Repeat reaction with more template |
21 | Low concentration of donor DNA | Low yield | Repeat by setting up multiple reactions per donor and pool for PCR purification |
35 | No cells survive positive selection | Low HDR efficiency | Repeat electroporation and scale up number of targeted cells. Alternatively, extend homology arms to 160 bp using an ultramer oligo for PCR |
41 | Undetectable on-target cassette integration | Genotyping PCR is not optimal (more common) or cassette is present only in off-target locus | Redesign genotyping primers. Alternatively, change KI locus |
45 | KI cells are resistant to negative selection | Presence of untargeted cells due to incomplete positive selection | Increase concentration of positive selection. If needed, single-cell clones can be derived |
49 | No differential survival between negative control and targeted cells treated with negative selection | (i) Inefficient delivery of sgRNAs. (ii) sgRNAs do not efficiently create the intended DSBs |
(i) Repeat with increased concentration of sgRNAs. (ii) Design new sgRNAs targeting the intended locus |
57 | Low frequency of cells with deletion | Negative selection not robust | Repeat deletion electroporation followed by more stringent negative selection. The cell number can be scaled accordingly to increase yield |