Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 4;13(23):7384. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237384

Table 1.

Clinical summary for the three patient groups with prostate cancer including imaging and histopathology findings.

Feature MRI+/PET+ MRI+/PET− MRI−/PET+
Characteristics Number of patients
Age (mean ± SD) in years
9 *
64.1 ± 6.2
2
57 ± 9.9
7
63.3 ± 6.6
PSA (mean ± SD) in ng/mL 13 ± 17.5 2.8 ± 2.7 8.9 ± 3.3
MRI (PI-RADS score) 4 (n = 2)
5 (n = 7)
4 (n = 2) 1 (n = 1)
2 (n = 5)
3 (n = 1) #
PSMA PET/CT (lesion absent or present) Present Absent Present
Surgical pathology ISUP score 2 (n = 1)
3 (n = 4)
5 (n = 3)
2 (n = 2) 2 (n = 2)
3 (n = 3)
4 (n = 1)
5 (n = 1)
Pathological stage pT2 (n = 2)
pT3a (n = 4)
pT3b (n = 3)
pT2 (n = 2) pT2 (n = 3)
pT3a (n = 3)
pT3b (n = 1)
Positive margins, n(%) 5 (55%) 1 (50%) 2 (28%)

Abbreviations: PSA—prostate-specific antigen, MRI—magnetic resonance imaging, PSMA PET/CT—prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography, PI-RADS—Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, ISUP—International Society of Urological Pathology. * One patient had a PSA of 59 (outlier) and was placed on neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, which led to no Gleason grades/ISUP score assigned for histopathology due to treatment effect. # PI-RADS 3 due to diffuse low signal changes within the prostate most likely due to prostatitis.