Table 1.

Comparison of different modifiers used in AP and DA measurement.

Electrode Material	Linear Range (µM)		LOD (µM)		Refs.
	AP	DA	AP	DA
C-ZIF-67/SP/GCE	0.5–100	1–100	0.27	0.58	[32]
3D RGO/MWCNTs@ZrFeOx	1–14 14–190	1–12, 12–180	0.230	0.212	[29]
UiO-66-NH2/CNTs/GCE	0.03–2	0.03–2	0.009	0.015	[33]
Ce-MOF-COOH/CB0.4	2.5–617	2.5–310	0.057	0.03	[34]
CeO2:BaMoO4/3DPE electrode	-	5–1000 μM	-	2.77	[35]
The clavate-shaped BiVO4	0.5–100	-	0.2	-	[36]
Co, Mo@CNFs	-	0.01–1000	-	0.00235	[37]
Co2P hybrid	-	0.2–10, 10–50	-	0.018	[38]
CoFe-LDH/GCE	2–900	2–900	0.37	0.08	[39]
CuNi-MOF@rGO	-	1–500	-	9.41	[40]
CuO-Cu2O	5–100	2–100	0.06	0.1	[41]
CoP3/Cu3P NRs/CF	-	0.2–2000	-	0.51	[42]
Fcmc/Ni-Pd/f-MWCNT	-	2–400	-	0.05	[43]
FeCo@C	0.001–0.8	-	0.59	-	[44]
FeS2/CoS2NHs/GCE	1–27,000	1–24,000	0.8	1.1	[45]
MIL-125(Ti–Al)-75%NH2	-	5–100	-	0.0876	[46]
MoS2/rGO/GCE	-	0.1–110.0	-	0.013	[47]
N-HKUST-1/Au composite	1–4448.4	-	0.16	-	[48]
Ni-MOFs/MWCNTs	-	2–200	-	0.017	[49]
NiO–ZnO/rGO	-	0.0041–0.054	-	0.0076	[50]
PS-PDEA-PS/MWCNT–COOH	1.5–85.1 85.1–235.1	-	0.57	-	[51]
Pt/Ppy	4–150	0.1–8	0.9	0.078	[52]
Ti3C2/CoNP-NCNTHP	0.5–350	-	0.05	-	[53]
Ti3C2Tx@TiO2 NSs	-	40–300	-	0.19	[54]
TM-CNT600	-	10.7–24.2	-	1.42	[55]
ZnCo2O4@Fe3O4/MWCNTs	1.0–150.0	-	0.018	-	[1]
Zn-rich Zn-Co BTC MOF	-	0.1–500	-	0.04	[56]
WBiVO4/f-MWCNTs/SPCE	0.5–36.5 48.5–158.5	-	0.082	-	[3]
CoNi-MOF@ERGO/GCE	-	0.1−400	-	0.086	[57]
MOF-5@MWCNTs	0.005–150, 150–600	0.1–10, 10–60	0.061	0.0075	This work