Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2024 May 6;64(4):1461–1476. doi: 10.1007/s12088-024-01288-5

Biodetection Strategies for Selective Identification of Candidiasis

Riya Verma 1, Smriti Gaba 1, Nidhi Chauhan 1, Ramesh Chandra 2,3,4,5, Utkarsh Jain 1,
PMCID: PMC11645395  PMID: 39678986

Abstract

Fungi are among the predominant pathogens seen in a greater proportion of infections acquired in healthcare settings. A common fungus that causes infections in medical settings is Candida species. Hospitalized patients who suffer from fungal diseases such as candidiasis and candidemia often have elevated rates of mortality and morbidity. It is evident that longer hospital stays have the possibility of bacterial and fungal recurrence and also have a negative economic impact. If left untreated, a Candida infection can spread to other organs and cause a systemic infection that can result in sepsis. Clinicians can treat patients quickly when fungal infections are timely detected, this enhances the results of clinical trials. Developing novel, sensitive, and quick methods for detecting Candida species is imperative. Conventional detection techniques are unsuitable for clinical settings and point-of-care systems as they require expensive equipment and take a longer detection time. This review examines a few of the most widely used biosensor systems for the detection of Candida species, their sensitivity, and the limit of detection. It focuses on various biorecognition elements used and follows utilization and advances in nanotechnology in the context of sensing. In addition to enabling general analysis and quick real-time analysis, crucial for detecting Candida species, biosensors provide an intriguing alternative to more conventional techniques.

Keywords: Biosensors, Candida species, Nanomaterials, Invasive fungal infection, Detection, Biorecognition, Candidiasis

Introduction

Candida is a pathogen that is sometimes referred to as "opportunistic." Nonetheless, the word "opportunistic" might be interpreted to mean that the host immune system is a predisposing risk factor for candida infection. The significant role of Candida species as the major cause of hospital-acquired infections is becoming well-acknowledged [1]. Candida infections have lately emerged as a serious health problem for immunocompromised people, and their present diagnosis is accurate yet time-consuming. Fungi are part of the ubiquitous skin microbiome, although certain species are harmful. Fungal skin infections are thought to impact 20-25% of the world's population [2]. Candida-related diseases of the skin and superficial mucosal areas are caused by a symbiotic relationship between fungal virulence and host defenses. Moreover, Candida releases a peptide toxin called candidalysin which is the cause of pathogenesis [3]. Many Candida infections include the production of biofilms on surgical implants that consist of indwelling catheters or prosthetic heart valves [1]. Invasive candidiasis occurs when an infection spreads to the circulation and can spread across different body organs [4]. As a result, new approaches to treating Candida infections are required, as it appears unlikely that established conventional methods will significantly reduce the complications in mucocutaneous Candida infections along with the high death rate caused by invasive candidiasis [5]. Invasive candidiasis is a new illness that is intimately related to medical technological advancements. It is well acknowledged as a major source of mortality and morbidity in the health-care setting [6].

Various kinds of Candida species cause infection, particularly Candida albicans (C. albicans) is a major source of infections. It is an opportunistic infection that causes severe threats in immunocompromised people [4, 7]. There are around 350 distinct species of Candida, however only a few are linked to human disease: C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, C. lusitaniae, C. utilis, C. kefyr, C. lipolytica, C. famata, C. haemulonii, C. krusei, C. rugosa, and C. guilliermondii are all examples of Candida species. Antifungal medication resistance has emerged as a result of prolonged usage of antifungal medicines for the treatment of Candida species [5]. Prominent diagnostic techniques that are sold commercially have been created using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), germ tube tests, PCR-based commercial systems, and the formation of chlamydospores. When it comes to identifying Candida species, conventional techniques have long been the gold standard. However, these techniques typically call for extra testing; they are tedious, time-consuming, and unreliable in detecting the wide range of Candida species [8]. Novel, sensitive, and quick approaches and techniques to detect Candida are highly needed.

The biosensor development technique focuses on sensitivity, specificity, early detection, non-toxicity, tiny molecule detection, and cost efficiency [9]. A better coupling of bio-fabrication and sensing with synthetic biology approaches based on optical, electrochemical, or bioelectronics principles, or a mix of all of these, will be critical for the effective creation of strong biosensors for the current period and day-to-day living. Biosensors have had a significant effect in a variety of sectors, including therapeutic applications, due to benefits such as high purity and sensitivity, miniaturization potential, mobility, low cost, and quick response. Recently discovered biomarkers and technological developments are increasingly illuminating the subtleties of many biological mechanisms in health and illness, indicating new targets for diagnostics and therapies [10]. A diagnostic test is any procedure for determining the ailment or condition of a patient. In the instance of infectious illnesses, it enables the identification of infection. The significance of simple, inexpensive, accurate, and speedy diagnosis tests is explained by their impact on clinical treatment since early detection impacts therapeutic success and prevents life-threatening complications and pathogen spread. Numerous papers on electrical approaches, growth rate, colorimetry, luminescence, fluorescence, and other fungal-based biosensors have been published. Thanks to recent advances in molecular biology, such as the insertion of novel coding sequences or the alteration of the fungal genome, more precise, accurate, and cost-effective techniques are now accessible [11].

New rapid and sensitive methodologies and procedures for detecting Candida species are desperately needed. Biosensor technology is continually advancing; this interdisciplinary industry was worth more than 25 billion USD the previous year and it is estimated to be worth 37 billion USD by 2026. The link between nanotechnology and biosensors improves responsiveness by improving electrochemical processes and signal amplification offered by nanoparticles. When coated with other metals, these nanoparticles perform better in immobilizing biomolecules. Encouraging their use in medicine, imaging, and biological sensing [11, 12]. Electrochemical biosensors are a great alternative to traditional approaches since they detect analytes quickly, are inexpensive, and can be miniaturized. Candida virulence is linked to its cell wall, which is flexible and responds to its genetics and adaption [12]. In this review, we look at the benefits and advantages of Candida-based biosensors for evaluating environmental samples quickly and accurately [13].

Candidiasis

Almost in a healthy individual, some Candida species including C. dubliniensis, C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. glabrata live as normal microflora of skin and surface of the mucosa (vagina, oral cavity, and gastrointestinal tract). In 71% of the healthy population, these yeast species can be detected and diagnosed [14]. Patients in critical care have a heightened vulnerability to candida infection due to their extensive reliance on medical devices, including central venous lines, arterial lines, bladder catheters, hemodialysis, organ transplants, and indwelling catheters and devices. These small devices are all entry points for further infection and colonization of species [15]. Several Candida species are commonly isolated as well. The second most prevalent strain, C. parapsilosis, has been linked to bloodstream infections caused by hyperalimentation, preterm newborns, or contaminated prosthetic devices [16]. There are a lot of risk factors for some species of NAC (N-acetylcysteine): neonates, foreign body insertion and hyperalimentation are associated with C. parapsilosis; azoles prophylaxis, neutropenia, and BMT (bone marrow transplantation) are associated with C. krusei; surgery, azoles prophylaxis, and urinary or vascular catheters are associated with C. glabrata; prior polyene use (nystatin or amphotericin B) is associated with C. lusitaniae and C. guilliermondii; burns are associated with C. rugosa [16].

Oral Candidiasis

In healthy humans, C. albicans is the most frequently occurring species in humans. Oral candidiasis occurs in healthy oral mucosa because of its higher degree of pathogenicity and adhesion characteristics [17]. Among the other species of Candida are C. glabrata, C. dubliniensis, C. parapsilosis, C. stellatoidea, C. krusei, C. kefyr and C. tropical, C. albicans is the most pathogenic as it is found in 80% of oral lesions [18]. There are two ways that oral candidiasis (OC) can appear: white or erythematosus. Lesions that are white, such as hyperplasic; and pseudo-membranous candidiasis are indicative of white OC. Red lesions are indicative of erythematosus OC [19].

Invasive Candidiasis

Although at least fifteen different species of Candida may infect humans, five pathogens account for the majority of invasive infections: C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. Krusei [20, 21]. The pathogenesis of IC involves three main elements: (1) an increase in fungal burden or colonization, usually due to the use of a wide range of antimicrobial agents; (2) a breakdown of normal skin and mucosal barriers due to recent trauma or surgery, prolonged indwelling intravascular devices, severe mucositis from cytotoxic chemotherapy, and radiation (3) immune dysfunction (e.g., neutropenia) that causes diffusion and the growth in deep tissues as shown in Fig. 1 [22, 23]. Increased fungal load along with modifications to the skin and mucous membranes to keep infections out are often the causes of the pathogenesis of IC. Candida is very skilled in adhering to surfaces and creating biofilms on human surfaces and prosthetic devices, such as intravascular and urinary catheters [2426].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Oral candidiasis is associated with aberrant yeast (C. albicans) production. Adhesion and penetration of hyphae invasive in the intestinal lining result in localized infection, while invasive infection and candidaemia are caused by invasive or seeded Candida into the bloodstream. Significantly sick individuals usually develop systemic candidiasis when Candida becomes an opportunistic infection that spreads by entering the blood circulation and mainly seeding the kidney

Systemic Candidiasis

Candida adherence and colonization of skin and vaginal mucosa as well as oropharyngeal and gastrointestinal mucosa are common causes of systemic infection [27]. Neutropenia alone is probably one of the worst factors in systemic candidiasis. Neutropenia severity and frequency seem to be highly related to candidiasis incidence in patients with solid tumours and hematologic malignancies [28]. Prolonged systemic candidiasis can impact the central nervous system (CNS) and cause widespread encephalopathy with reduced awareness, with microabscesses as the main lesions [29]. The diagnosis of CNS candidiasis is the current problem [30]. The prevalence of candidaemia varies according to age, location, local epidemiology, and other variables. Three to five cases for every 1,000 people in the overall population and one to two percent for all patients in the intensive care unit are reported by the majority of significant national surveys [31]. The types and pathogenesis of Candida is shown in Fig. 1.

Detection Strategies for Candida Species

In regular laboratory settings, the process of identifying Candida isolates involves a polyphasic method that involves the combination of morphological characteristics, assimilation and fermentation profiles, specific metabolite identification, and growth on differential media. These phenotypic techniques are inconsistent at times, sluggish, and may not be able to discriminate between closely related species. Moreover, not all clinically important species are listed in the databases [3234]. Patients with immunosuppression resulting from many disorders, such as cancer, kidney transplantation, use of antibiotics with a wide spectrum (BSA), and other conditions are more prone to Candida as it is an opportunistic pathogen [35, 36]. When it comes to antifungal medications, some species like C. albicans are less susceptible to them than others, such as P. kudriazevii/C. krusei, and C. glabrata. Moreover, fluconazole resistance is higher in these species. Echinocampanoids and other azoles have become ineffective against C. glabrata [37, 38]. Some techniques take several days to evaluate biological reactions using quantitative testing, including the ID32C and VITEK systems [39]. Hibiscus sabdariffa (Hs) extract has been shown in research to have potential anti-microbial action. Hs is also a potential medication candidate and a stand-in for removing pre-formed biofilm and preventing the development of C. albicans [40]. Since different species of Candida have varying levels of resistance to antifungals, it is critical to quickly identify yeast at the species level to provide the optimal antifungal treatment and an early diagnosis.

A variety of molecular assays have been developed for diagnostic purposes, including peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH), matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and (PCR) polymerase chain reaction in different formats (real-time, multiplex, semi-nested, nested, simplex) directly linked to enzymatic restriction (PCR-RFLP) or enzyme immunoassay (PCR-EIA). MALDI-TOF and real-time PCR can accurately and broadly detect a wide variety of clinically significant pathogens at the species level [4143]. Direct inspection along with traditional blood culture continues to detect through the gold standard of bloodstream fungal infections in laboratories, including candidaemia. These techniques, however, have limited therapeutic use since up to 50% of autopsy-confirmed cases of candidaemia have unfavourable outcomes. Furthermore, cultures could not turn positive until much later in the illness [44]. An easy and quick PCR-based multiplex technique that uses amplification of fragments of specific DNA from the regions ITS1 and ITS2, can identify eight clinically relevant Candida species including (C. krusei, albicans, tropicalis, parapsilosis, glabrata, dubliniensis, lusitaniae, and guilliermondii). Using a single PCR reaction, the approach combines two primers specific to yeast and eight primers unique to Candida species, producing 2 amplicons having varying sizes for each of the species. Furthermore, the following approach offers several benefits over existing methods: (1) It may be used to evaluate a variety of medical samples, like urine and blood culture bottles; (2) It is possible to add whole yeast cells directly in PCR mix; (3) limit of detection was 2.1590.25 cells/ml, makes it extremely sensitive and specific; (4) It can discriminate between distinct species of Candida that are involved in poly fungal infections at a maximum ratio of 1:10; (5) It is very reproducible in a variety of labs and PCR heat cycles. Taken together, the characteristics of this approach suggest a new and very beneficial use to identify Candida species in epidemiological research and medical diagnostics [45].

In various background species like Malassezia furfur, Staphylococcus aureus, Penicillium citrinum, and Bacillus subtilis, which are frequently found in hospital settings and skin flora, loop-mediated isothermal amplification can be used to identify them. The ferredoxin oxidoreductase domain, which codes for pyruvate, is present in C. auris and it is swift, extremely perceptive, and precise [46]. C. albicans, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis were all detectable using chromogenic media. The detection of "multi-species" yeast infections was also aided by chromogenic media [47]. Therefore, in the context of a hospital epidemic, the new chromogenic medium chromagartm Candida plus is a viable choice for the identification of additional yeasts as well as to identify and detect C. auris in colonization investigations [48]. Automated T2DX equipment is used to carry out a culture-independent test to identify C. auris in skin swabs [49].

A tiered statistical classification technique was applied to evaluate one-dimensional proton NMR spectra. When compared to traditional and DNA-based identification methods, NMR spectra analysis of C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. albicans produced a quick and accurate diagnosis. The five yeast species were classified using spectral areas that showed species-specific variations in the proportions of lipids, trehalose, polyols, and other metabolites. NMR spectroscopy usually combined with a quantitative segmentation method is a quick, harmless, moreover potentially beneficial technique that can be applied widely to fungus for chemotaxonomic characterization and identification [50]. According to the French Standard criteria, 143 strains of C. auris and non-auris were successfully verified using dried tubes (extracted DNA was added). GPSTM MONODOSE canaur dtec-qpcr species-specific probes and primers showed satisfactory levels of specificity (exclusiveness/ inclusiveness), sensitivity, reliability (repeatability/ reproducibility), quantification and limits of detection [51].

The most common eight Candida species including C. guilliermondii/M. guilliermondii, C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei/P. kudriazevii, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, and C. lusitaniae that cause infection can be specifically identified using the candf and candr oligonucleotides. Moreover, the PCR test employing the candr and candf primers' specificity, sensitivity, and negative and positive predictive value confirms its potential use in the diagnosis of systemic candidiasis [52]. In a study, they used the ribosomal DNA-coding regions that are unique from those of Aspergillus and Penicillium but conserved within Candida to construct pan-Candida primer sets in research. The final two sets of pan-Candida primers were demonstrated to be effective, with a detection sensitivity of as low as 10 fg of Candida genomic DNA, and they would not amplify Aspergillus DNA, to distinguish eight clinically significant Candida pathogens in real-time PCR assays based on their melting profiles [53]. According to the literature, various platforms demonstrated the accuracy and sensitivity of tub-simplex PCR targeting the beta-tubulin genes, and it has the potential to identify seven clinically significant species of Candida (C. glabrata, C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, C. tropicalis, C. dubliniensis, C. guilliermondii) by use of seven pre-defined melting clusters. These characteristics of the tub-simplex PCR make it advantageous for use as a first-pass diagnostic supplement on blood culture bottles in microbiology laboratories or for direct whole blood testing, as they enable patient follow-up [43]. As a result, accurate and timely identification of Candida species can be crucial for managing infections and lowering death rates. These consist of quick processes like fluorogenic and enzymatic testing, commercially available procedures, automated systems, and recently developed molecular typing approaches. The germ-tube test, morphological analyses, and carbohydrate ingestion are examples of conventional techniques. However, accurately identifying every isolate from clinical samples can be difficult and time-consuming [54, 55]. Traditional methods have been the standard for identifying Candida species for a very long time. Nevertheless, these techniques typically call for extra testing and are time-consuming, and unreliable in detecting the wide range of Candida species.

Even though these approaches have been widely used to identify Candida, their use is restricted, and certain species cannot be distinguished from one another [8]. Molecular approaches may offer an option for accurate and quick identification of Candida species as blood culture-based methods are insensitive and conventional methods for species-specific identification take a long time and sometimes result in misinterpretation within closely related species [56]. Nevertheless, the methodological difficulty of certain tests or the lack of necessary specialist infrastructure has limited its utilization in hospital laboratories. Therefore, it is imperative to create novel assays utilizing precise, easy-to-use, reasonably priced, and accessible procedures that may be used in any laboratory to accurately identify Candida species.

Biosensor Technology

A biosensor is an analytical tool that combines a particular biological component (which produces a recognition event) with a physical component (which transduces the recognition event) in a purposeful and personal way. The term "biosensor" designates a device that combines two components: a sensor element and a bio-element. The fundamental ideas behind how a biosensor works can be demonstrated. An enzyme or other specific bio element detecting a specific analyte triggers a sensor element, which then transforms the biomolecule's change into an electrical signal as shown in Fig. 2 [57]. The bio-element has an extremely narrow sensitivity to analytes. Other analytes are not recognized by it. Biosensors may be classified into many varieties based on the transducing mechanism used.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic and working of biosensors using different analytes and biorecognition elements

These include thermal detection biosensors, optical detection biosensors, electrochemical biosensors, ion-sensitive field-effect transistor (ISFET) biosensors, and resonant biosensors [57, 58]. Compact analytical devices called optical-based biosensors have an integrated optical transducer and a bio-recognition component. These biosensors work on the principle that the amount of light absorbed or emitted is determined by changes in quantity analysis of the analyte being quantified, where molecules on the receptors and analyte interact to cause alteration in the medium's refractive index (RI) [59]. Another literature about brand-new Immuno-based microfluidic tool for quick C. albicans detection in whole human blood has been reported. Unfortunately, due to its less sensitivity, the technology of the microchip was able to capture C. albicans in the solution of phosphate buffer with an effectiveness of 61–78% for the cell concentrations ranging from 10 to 105 cfu/ml. Besides, the technology can be applied to other biosensors making it flexible approach and could also be further improved to provide greater specificity and sensitivity [5960].

Biosensors can be classified as either (i) optical, (ii) electrochemical, (iii) thermometric, or (iv) piezoelectric based on the kind of transducer used [61]. The primary components of the Candida cell wall include mannoproteins, enzymes, chitin, and -glucan, some of which have been studied before as potential intermediate targets for lipopeptide antimycotics [62]. The Candida species C. tropicalis and C. albicans displayed the greatest electrochemical response measured using the impedimetric method. One of the amphipathic amps, clavanin A, was discovered in the hemocytes of the marine organism Styela clava. Clavanin has shown antifungal effects, causing C. albicans transmembrane potential to rapidly dissipate [12]. Different methods, including counter immunoelectrophoresis and radioimmunoassay, are used in serological testing for Candida. But their specificity, as well as sensitivity, are uneven including up to 40% false positive and negative rates [63]. A C. albicans biosensor has been designed to improve the performance features of the currently accessible methods. The fundamental concept behind it is a field-effect transistor (FET) with a conductor channel composed of a series of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs). Adsorbed onto the SWCNT were anti-Candida monoclonal antibodies, which offered particular fungal antigen binding sites [64]. The major cause of candidiasis is an endogenous infection brought on by an excess of the body's fungus. While being subjected to C. albicans at different concentrations for just one hour, FET devices were able to determine at least 50 cfu (colony-forming units)/ml [64, 65].

Apparently, few biosensors have been designed that can identify Candida species. Furthermore, as described, they are coupled with technologies and approaches like microfluidics, nanomaterials, and lab-on-a-chip as summarized in Table 1. A potentiometric technique developed by Muramatsu et al. might be used in an immunoassay for C. albicans. For this, he utilized piezoelectric immunologic crystals coated in anti-Candida immunoglobulin that had been immobilized. The greatest amount of C. albicans cells (3.7 X 107cells cm-2) were absorbed by the palladium anodically which oxidized at +1.4V vs. (Ag/AgCl) among the four electrode pretreatments [65]. In this study, they incorporated a monolayer that self-assembles (MBA) 4-mercaptobenzoic acid onto the electrode to bind amine-functionalized gold-capped magnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4@Au). Synthetic temporin-PTA (T-PTA) was employed as a fungal biorecognition element. For C. albicans, a linear range of 101to105 cfu/ml and a detection of limit 101 cfu/ml were found. For the identification of Candida, the T-PTA biosensor platform is a useful and effective technique [11]. Sá et.al. developed the ConA and WGA lectin employed as recognition components in an electrochemical biosensor platform for the identification of infective species of Candida. With remarkable sensitivity, the sensor platform distinguished between live cells of C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and C. albicans. All species of Candida evaluated in both lectin-based bioassay yielded a limit detection range from 102 to 106 cfu/ml. Depending on the lectin type, the biosensor displayed various responses, as seen below: Biosensor based on ConA (C. parapsilosis < C. tropicalis < C. albicans < C. krusei) and biosensor based on WGA (C. tropicalis <C. albicans <C. parapsilosis <C. krusei) [66]. This study uses electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to identify yeast cells that have been caught on electrodes that have been specially functionalized with anti-Candida antibodies. The membrane-based sensor will be further altered to allow for direct diagnosis of C. albicans infections from blood samples and blood processing through filtering. The biosensor was shown to have sensitivity down to 10 cfu/ml in a (PBS) sample, which is at clinically meaningful levels [67]. Another work aimed to detect C. albicans using the technique of surface plasmon resonance imaging, or SPR imaging. Covalent immobilization of the captured antibody was achieved on the mixed self-assembled monolayer (SAMs). SAMs ratio which was mixed between 3-mercaptopropanol and 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid was changed to discover the best ratio for usage as a sensor surface. The findings demonstrated that although mixed SAMs with the ratio 1:40 had a greater non-specific signal than mixed SAMs 1:0, the carboxylic SAM surface (mixed SAMs 1:0) was the most appropriate for C. albicans detection. For direct detection, the detection limit was 107cells/ml [68]. One novel application of citrate-reduced Ag nanoparticles via surface-enhanced Raman spectral biosensors approach based on a 514 nm laser enables quick and effective monitoring of highly concentrated scattered C. albicans cells (>108cfu/ml). The subsequent derivative and smoothing from the Savitzky-Golay algorithm preprocessed the principal component evaluation of a high-level frequency characteristic of the SERS from C. albicans and other micro-organisms [69]. In this study, they created a unique electrochemical signal for determining the quorum-sensing compounds (tryptophol) in the albicans fungal growth in the electrode matrix. The amount of tryptophol secreted into the C. albican’s extracellular matrix as shown in Fig. 3b to be linked to the major precursor of tryptophol. The novel approach has been optimized after factors affecting test sensitivity were explored. The approach was used to measure tryptophol in C. albicans cultures [70].

Table 1.

Biosensors used for the detection of Candida species

S. No Species Platform Biorecognition element Nanoparticle Limit of detection Purpose Refer ences
1 C.kursei, C.tropicalis, C. albicans, C. parapsilosis Impedimetric Biosensor Concanavalin A (ConA) wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) AuNPs and MBA-AuNPs 102 cfu/ml Identification of pathogenic Candida species [66]
2 C. albicans Electrochem ical Impedance Spectroscopy Anti-Candida antibodies NA 101 cfu/ml High sensitivity and specificity towards C.albicans [67]
3 C. albicans SPR (surface plasmo resonance) Imaging Biosensor Antibody mixed with self assembles monolayers (SAMs) NA 107cells/ ml (direct assay)106 cells/ml (sandwich assay) Identify C. albicans from the blended microbial mixture without the need for a proficient professional [68]
4 C. albicans Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) Surface of cells cultured Ag nanoparticles 108 cfu/ml Ag nanoparticles can be used to detect large amounts of dispersed C. albicans cells quickly and sensitively [69]
5 C. albicans Electrochemicalsensor Cyclic macromolecule NA 1 μg/ml An electrochemical method that is both specific and sensitive for tryptophol in yeast cultures [70]
6 C. auris Oligonucleo tides-capped nanoporous anodic alumina biosensor Oligonucleotide oligonucleotid e-gated 6 cfu/ml (0.3 pg/µl) Fast and reliable diagnosis [71]
7 C. krusei C.guilliermondii PCR Electrospray Ionization-mass Spectrometry (ESI-MS) NA NA 100 cfu/ml For detection and identification of C. albicans [72]
8 C. glabrata FRET-based Biosensors cAMP-PKA activity NA NA Screening of cAMP-PKA in C. glabrata [73]
9 C. dubliniens SPR Biosensor Concanavalin A (Con A) lectin NA 0.1 nM To estimate the efficiency of the immunization against C. dubliniensis [74]
10 C. tropicalis Amperometric biosensor Glutaraldehyde NA 0.5–7.5 mM The biosensor response may be affected by interference, substrate accuracy, or certain chemicals [75]
11 C. tropicalis Microbial Biosensor, L-Ascorbic acid NA 62 μM Fast, effective and sensitive [77]
12 C. albicans Chip biosensor Enzyme aspartyl proteinase NA NA As a cutting-edge detection technique for the quick and accurate identification of fungal infections in immunocompromised patients' plasma samples [78]
13 C. albicans (2D) Photonic Crystal (PC) Sensor Con A NA 32 cfu/ml Differentiates between E. coli, a gram-negative bacteria, and C. albicans, which do not have cell-surface mannan [79]
14 C. albicans Microchip Biosensor Antigen NA 10 cfu/ml Technique will be helpful in clinical and point-of-care settings to screen for different infections [80]
15 C. albicans, C. tropicalis Electrochem ical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) Temporin-PTA (T-PTA) And gold-capped magnetic 101 cfu/ml This platform is an efficient and promising instrument for microbiological identification [11]
16 C. albicans Piezoelectric immunosensor Anti-Candida antibody Palladium-plated NA The sensor's viability in identifying C. albicans [65]

NA, not applicable

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Principle of biosensors used in Candida detection. a The Con-A hydrogel protein binds with the mannose of C. albicans, cross-linkage leading to a reduction in the level of 2D particle spacing, which causes a 2D array diffraction blue-shift giving C. albicans concentration; b working electrode surface with multi-walled carbon nanotube and 12-crown-4 that interact selectively with quorum sensing molecule, tryptophol; c fungal cell release enzyme like phospholipase/aspartyl proteinase which causes degradation of the biodegradable polymer resulting in a change in colour intensity; d the protein G-based on surface chemistry was used for the immobilization of the anti-Candida antibody on the surface

This paper describes a new method that employs a fluorogenic nanosensor to identify C. auris. The technology consists of oligonucleotide-capped NAA mesoporous scaffolds that have been coated with a fluorophore. The capping oligonucleotides are released from the NAA surface when C. auris genetic DNA is present, which causes the pore to open and release the encapsulated fluorophore. In this study, a highly specific, and time-competitive biosensor constructed from oligonucleotide-gated nanomaterials for efficient detection of C. auris is reported. With clinical samples, C. auris may be found at concentrations as low as 6 cfu/ml, which allows for an hour-long diagnostic process [71]. In this study, the literature revealed that the identification accuracy of the approach will be determined by comparing the PCR-ESI/MS results with standard-of-care clinical microbiology findings from culture as well as analyte-specific molecular techniques. Both standard-of-care and PCR-ESI/MS data shall be contrasted to non-microbiological clinical findings to determine the relative utility of the two techniques for the identification and detection of etiologically relevant Candida species [72]. They demonstrate the use of two FRET-based biosensors to permit effective tracking of the pathogen's cAMP-PKA activity. Changes in cAMP concentration and protein kinase A(PKA) activity can be monitored in a time-resolved fashion, as demonstrated through glucose-induced pathway initiation. Also, they discuss how to manage and interpret the data correctly in a way that is both physiologically applicable and numerically accurate as they primarily detect C. glabrata [73]. Fabrication and evaluation of an SPR-based biosensor chip on precipitated mannan derived from the species C. dubliniensis for applications such as determining the capability of generated antibodies attached to their antigen to gauge the effectiveness of vaccination reviewed in this paper [74]. The study revealed that a microbial biosensor created based on C. tropicalis cells may be utilized for the effective detection of ethanol levels even in the availability of other alcohols that may be discovered to be found in the same solution as ethanol. Yet no research in the literature on building a microbial biosensor for ethanol detection based on the C. tropicalis cells suspended in the gelatin was found [75]. Wang el. at. describe C. tropicalis was detected using a combination of lateral flow biosensors (LFB) and multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA). As a result, the best reaction temperature for the MCDA test of C. tropicalis was 30 minutes at 64°C and each reaction required 10fg of DNA. The results reported for 300 sputum samples showed that all 28/300 C. Tropicalis-positive samples discovered using the gold-standard method could be rapidly and effectively diagnosed by the MCDA-LFB test [76]. O-aminophenol was used to immobilize lyophilized C. tropicalis yeast cells by electropolymerizing an acrylic sheet on an electroplated platinum surface. L-ascorbic acid was measured using the biosensor utilizing differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) and amperometric methods [77]. This study created a sensor chip on the polymer polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as a substitute diagnostic tool for the quick and accurate identification of fungal infections in immune-compromised people's plasma samples. Through matrix manipulation, the double-layered, biomimetic biosensor-based device may simultaneously eliminate potential bacterial co-infection and identify the yeast's aspartyl proteinase enzyme. The biosensor structure comprises a polymer layer coated with a thin covering of metal dubbed Inconel, which is vulnerable to breakdown by lytic enzymes such as aspartyl proteinase. The thickness of the polymer layer is shown by the colour shift on the biosensor's surface that is apparent to the unaided eye as shown in Fig. 3c [78]. Zhongyu Cai et al. offers a novel detection approach that uses two-dimensional (2D) photonic crystal (PC) sensing materials to detect C. albicans alone. These sensors use Concanavalin A (Con A) protein hydrogels, which have a 2D PC implanted on the surface of the hydrogel. Mannan on the surface of C. albicans binds to the Con A protein hydrogel surface multivalently and selectively to generate crosslinks. The ensuing crosslinks cause the light diffracted from the PC to change blue, the Con A protein hydrogel to contract, and the 2D PC particle spacing to decrease as shown in Fig. 3a. Through the use of a spectrometer, visual monitoring, or the Debye diffraction ring diameter, one may determine the diffraction shifts. For C. albicans, our hydrogel sensor is unoptimized and has a threshold for identification of about 32cfu/ml [79]. Asghar et al. designed an innovative immune-based microfluidics technology that can quickly detect and extract C. albicans from human whole blood and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). With an effectiveness of 61–78% at concentrations that vary between 101 and 105 cfu/ml, their microchip technique demonstrated three microchannels that were equipped with surface chemistry based on protein G as an effective capture of C. albicans in the PBS solution. The surface was treated using surface chemistry based on protein-G to immobilize anti-Candida antibodies as shown in Fig. 3d. Comparing polyclonal antibodies to monoclonal antibodies, they found that the former collected a noticeably higher quantity of Candida cells. Testing for potential medication resistance and susceptibility is made possible by the technique that is being described, which enables the capture and isolation of entire Candida cells [80].

Nanomaterial Used in Candida Detection

The area of biosensors is revolutionized by nanomaterials. Due to its industry-leading position, nanotechnology has developed several cutting-edge applications in recent decades for use in nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology, including drug delivery systems, biosensing and biodetection, and the development of novel treatments for incurable diseases like cancer [81, 82]. Since nanoparticles exhibit exceptional sensitivity for chemical and biological sensing, there has been a lot of interest in the subject of biosensors as a result of recent breakthroughs in nanotechnology [83]. Biosensors have made use of a wide range of nanoparticle types, including metal, oxide, semiconductor, and even nano-dimensional conducting polymers. For instance, multiple laboratories have reported using hybrid nanostructures of silver and silica or gold and silver nanoparticles as biosensor substrates [84, 85]. To enhance real-time, wireless monitoring and analysis of environmental and food conditions, further integration of electrical engineering, functional nanomaterials, microfabrication, and materials science with sensor technologies will be needed. It will be necessary to determine the detection levels appropriate for these practical applications to ensure the assurance and security of the environment and food, even though various detection limits at parts per trillion, femtomolar, or even small amounts have been described in the literature. Setting up detection limits is going to be essential for risk assessments. The ideal sensors would detect certain types of pollutants in food and environmental samples [86].

Several nanomaterials that are utilized in chemical compound identification are depicted schematically. Carbon-based materials comprise graphene, fullerenes (e.g., C60), single-walled carbon nanohorns (SWCNHs), multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs), single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), and among many more nanomaterials [87]. Recent research has suggested that nanomaterials represent a novel class of biological receptors. As nanotechnology and nanoscience have advanced, several nanomaterials have been employed as biorecognition systems [88]. NPs offer a wider variety of biosensing technology applications. In addition to transducers, NMs can function as bioreceptors. For instance, the biomimetic catalytic activity of NMs based on cerium oxide is beneficial for bioreceptors. Due to their strong conduction skills, a variety of inorganic materials, including graphene and CNT-based NMs, quantum dots, and noble metal NPs have been used as transducers [89]. Among the NPs are metal and noble metal NPs, which offer superior optical, electrical, magnetic, chemical, mechanical, and catalytic capabilities. Examples of these metals include silver (Ag), platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd), gold (Au), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), palladium (Pd), and cobalt (Co); also, metal oxide NPs, such as MnO2, TiO2, ZnO, and SnO2, are included. Coating with different matrices, such as metal oxides, silica networks, graphene, polymers, fibres, and dendrimers, can customize the performance of NP biosensing [90].

The impedimetric responses’ distinctive patterns were established by examining the lectins' selectivity to certain sugars on the surface of Candida spp. Sensitive detection and differentiation of live cells of C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, and C. albicans was achieved using the sensor platform. Using UV–Vis spectrophotometry, absorption of radiation by the synthesized nanoparticles (MBA-AuNPs and AuNPs) was evaluated, with a hypochromic shift taking place following the measurement of the wavelength transmittance band measurements of λ ¼ 533 nm and λ ¼ 524 nm. The absorption peaks line up with colloidal gold's surface plasmon resonance. The MBA structure's thiol group binds to the surface of AuNPs with a high affinity, leaving the COOH functional group open for posterior connections [66, 91]. Surface-enhanced Raman spectral biosensing technique, which uses a laser of 514 nm and nanoparticles based on citrate-reduced Ag, may be used to quickly and sensitively detect liquid-phase microorganisms, including an elevated focus on suspended C. albicans cells (>108 CFU/ml). The citrate-reduced Ag nanoparticles that interact with yeast cells may display localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), corresponding with the field-enhanced mechanism [69]. The addition of 10% of each crown ether (12-crown-4) and carbon nanotubes to the electrode matrix produced a unique electrochemical indication that could be used to identify the (tryptophol) quorum sensing molecule of C. albicans culture. Ultimately, using MWCNTs and 12-crwon-4-ether together, the sensitivity and selectivity were improved [70]. An efficient biosensor for the detection of C. auris is built on oligonucleotide-gated nanomaterials and it is specific, selective, and time-competitive. The article offers an alternative viewpoint for the detection of C. auris utilizing a fluorogenic nanosensor. NAA mesoporous support that have been loaded with a capped and fluorophore with an oligonucleotide make up the system [71]. New nanostructures are frequently integrated into biosensor designs to improve sensitivity (i.e., the rate at which the target analyte is correctly identified), specificity (i.e., the capacity to separate the target analyte from other sample components), and the lowest limit of detection (LOD). The lower quantity of a compound that can be identified from a sample without the analyte at a certain degree of confidence is known as the LOD of a biosensor [92, 93]. Materials that are inorganic, organic, or hybrid can be employed to create nanostructures for biosensors. The material selection is determined by the purpose of the component (such as electrode components or biosensor recognition elements) inside the biosensor device [94, 95]. Because inorganic materials can transmit, amplify, and modify electrical signals, they are frequently used in the production of electrical biosensors. Examples of these materials are metals and metal oxides [9698]. Both SERS and LSPR biosensors frequently use the functionalization of NPs onto a sensor platform to boost target-binding capacity [99, 100]. The findings demonstrated that all positive samples of C. tropicalis found through the gold-standard technique could be quickly and successfully identified by the MCDA-LFB assay. In this study, they effectively created an MCDA-LFB assay for the quick, easy, and accurate detection of C. tropicalis. In contrast to culture-based techniques and molecular detection tests, the MCDA-LFB assay eliminates the need for complex procedures, costly equipment, and highly qualified technical staff [76]. The synergistic properties of aptamer and gold nanoparticles are present in aptamer-conjugated gold nanoparticle complexes, such as strong binding affinity, high biocompatibility, improved target selectivity, and long circulation half-life [101]. Even at low concentrations, AuNPs have demonstrated strong effectiveness and selectivity toward their targets. AuNPs may enhance both the conductivity of the electrode and the mechanisms involved in charge transfer [65, 102]. There has been discussion of the broad use of nanomaterials, including freshly created ones in electrochemical and optical biosensing. This review addressed a range of nanomaterials and several infectious Candida species detection systems.

Challenges

Biosensor development for the determination and recognition of the species of Candida was started in 1986 earlier [103]. Biosensors have been employed in the medical profession for a long time, and this field is undoubtedly the one that benefits the most from the most commercially available devices, including those for the detection of harmful bacteria and other uses. The capability to make disposables on an extensive basis at a cheap price, notably with acceptable precision and repeatability, is the fundamental obstacle for biosensors to become essential analytical instruments for medicine. For instance, immunosensors are biosensors that can quickly identify antibodies (or antigens, depending on their size and configuration) in samples like blood, serum, saliva, urine, plasma, etc. They are crucial tools for the development of rapid test kits, particularly for infectious diseases. These innovative tools, which have a great deal of promise for point-of-care diagnostics, include optical, electrochemical, piezometric, and surface Plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors in addition to fluorescence-based technologies to detect biomolecular interactions efficiently [103]. The piezoelectric platform acts as a sensor element under the law of oscillations transform when a collecting leap develops on the surface of a piezoelectric crystal. Many biosensors may be developed for many additional species of Candida similarly. Artificial biosensors have made significant progress in terms of functioning, design, and applications to continuous advancements in chemical science and bioengineering [104]. The literature states that biosensors were primarily created to detect C. albicans, while other species that cause severe infections; it is essential to build biosensors that identify those species. Numerous applications of biosensors and bioelectronics have been made in the fields of life science, healthcare research, military, agriculture, and environment. These sensors can also be improved using nanobiotechnology and other prominent advances in sensing [105]. There are still many more species that can be quickly identified; we can process and find candidiasis with these biosensors.

Conclusion and Future Perspective

Innovative biosensing technologies with enhanced selectivity, sensitivity, and speed of response have come a long way in the previous several years. In conclusion, molecular investigations based on ITS sequencing are required for the identification of closely related and emerging species, even if traditional approaches may be utilized to accurately identify the most prevalent Candida species. The main Candida species infections are endogenously acquired. Thus, whereas species mostly linked to exogenously acquired illnesses, including C. parapsilosis, displayed minimal intraspecific variability, C. glabrata, C. albicans, C. lusitaniae, and C. tropicalis displayed considerable genetic variety. Biosensor technology will detect illness and perhaps prevent it. Biosensors may be able to detect an illness at its earliest stages, according to research from Stanford University. Sensing technology has benefited greatly from nanotechnology; the application of quantum dots, carbon nanotubes, and nanoparticles has helped to improve the consistency of biosensors. This paper describes the existing state of affairs and makes recommendations for future sensor research because there hasn't been much done on the utilization of certain nanomaterials for the detection of Candida species. It is crucial to keep in mind to conduct and track the progression of infectious illnesses, resource-constrained towns require an evidence-based decision-making tool that is standardized, and capable of attaining extremely low levels of detection. Looking ahead, potential developments in biosensing technology cleared the path for the introduction of more robust, convenient, scalable, affordable, and versatile devices that fit in with ease in daily activities. Wearable technology integration with biosensors will provide personalized healthcare delivery. Furthermore, advancements in synthetic biology and nanotechnology will open up new possibilities for developing more creative biosensing frameworks with unmatched sensitivity and specificity.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Shodh Grant (UPES/R&D/SHODH/202314) supported by UPES R&D, Dehradun to Nidhi Chauhan and Riya Verma.

Abbreviations

ISFET

Ion-sensitive field-effect transistor

NAC

N-acetylcysteine

BMT

Bone marrow transplantation

OC

Oral candidiasis

BSA

Broad spectrum antibiotic

PNA-FISH

Peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization

SWCNTs

Single-walled carbon nanotubes

SPR

Surface plasmon resonance

FET

Field-effect transistor

SAM

Self-assemble monolayer

SERS

Surface-enhanced Raman spectral

NP

Nanoparticle

LOD

Limit of detection

AuNP

Gold nanoparticle

C. albicans

Candida albicans

NMR

Nuclear magnetic resonance

Author Contributions

Riya Verma: Writing original draft, Review—writing and editing; Smriti Gaba: Writing original draft, Review—writing and editing, Nidhi Chauhan: Supervision, Review—writing and editing; Ramesh Chandra: Supervision, Review—writing and editing, Utkarsh Jain: Supervision, Conceptualization, Review—writing and editing.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Footnotes

The authors Riya Verma and Smriti Gaba are shared co-first authors.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Douglas LJ (2003) Candida biofilms and their role in infection. Trends Microbiol 11:30–36. 10.1016/S0966-842X(02)00002-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Havlickova B, Czaika VA, Friedrich M (2008) Epidemiological trends in skin mycoses worldwide. Mycoses 51:2–15. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01606.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Odds FC (1994) Pathogenesis of Candida infections. J Am Acad Dermatol 31:S2–S5. 10.1016/S0190-9622(08)81257-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lim CS-Y, Rosli R, Seow HF, Chong PP (2012) Candida and invasive candidiasis: back to basics. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31:21–31. 10.1007/s10096-011-1273-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rodrigues ME, Silva S, Azeredo J, Henriques M (2016) Novel strategies to fight Candida species infection. Crit Rev Microbiol 42:594–606. 10.3109/1040841X.2014.974500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Magill SS et al (2014) Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med 370:1198–1208. 10.1056/NEJMoa1306801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.He Z-X, Shi L-C, Ran X-Y, Li W, Wang X-L, Wang F-K (2016) Development of a lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. Front Microbiol 7:1451. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Neppelenbroek KH et al (2014) Identification of Candida species in the clinical laboratory: a review of conventional, commercial, and molecular techniques. Oral Dis 20:329–344. 10.1111/odi.12123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vigneshvar S, Sudhakumari CC, Senthilkumaran B, Prakash H (2016) Recent advances in biosensor technology for potential applications—an overview. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 4:11. 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rodovalho VR, Alves LM, Castro ACH, Madurro JM, Brito-Madurro AG, Santos AR (2015) Biosensors applied to diagnosis of infectious diseases–an update. Austin J Biosens Bioelectron 1:10–15 [Google Scholar]
  • 11.da Silva-Junio AG et al (2022) Electrochemical biosensor based on Temporin-PTA peptide for detection of microorganisms. J Pharm Biomed Anal 216:114788. 10.1016/j.jpba.2022.114788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ribeiro KL et al (2021) Impedimetric clavmo peptide-based sensor differentiates ploidy of candida species. Biochem Eng J 167:107918. 10.1016/j.bej.2020.107918 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Singh S, Kumar V, Dhanjal DS, Thotapalli S, Sonali, Singh J (2020) Importance and recent aspects of fungal-based biosensors. In: New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering. Elsevier, New York, pp 301–309. 10.1016/B978-0-12-821008-6.00018-9
  • 14.Patel A et al (2021) Multicenter epidemiologic study of coronavirus disease-associated mucormycosis, India. Emerg Infect Dis 27:2349–2359. 10.3201/eid2709.210934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alves J, Alonso-Tarrés C, Rello J (2022) How to identify invasive candidemia in ICU—A narrative review. Antibiotics 11:1804. 10.3390/antibiotics11121804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Krcmery V, Barnes AJ (2002) Non-albicans Candida spp. causing fungaemia: pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. J Hosp Infect 50:243–260. 10.1053/jhin.2001.1151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Talapko J et al (2021) Candidaalbicans—the virulence factors and clinical manifestations of infection. J Fungi 7:79. 10.3390/jof7020079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Al-Karaawi ZM et al (2002) Molecular characterization of Candida spp. isolated from the oral cavities of patients from diverse clinical settings. Oral Microbiol Immunol 17:44–49. 10.1046/j.0902-0055.2001.00081.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Millsop JW, Fazel N (2016) Oral candidiasis. Clin Dermatol 34:487–494. 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2016.02.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pappas PG et al (2003) A prospective observational study of candidemia: epidemiology, therapy, and influences on mortality in hospitalized adult and pediatric patients. Clin Infect Dis 37:634–643. 10.1086/376906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cleveland AA et al (2015) Declining incidence of candidemia and the shifting epidemiology of candida resistance in two US Metropolitan areas, 2008–2013: results from population-based surveillance. PLoS ONE 10:e0120452. 10.1371/journal.pone.0120452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Blumberg HM et al (2001) Risk Factors for Candidal Bloodstream Infections in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients: The NEMIS Prospective Multicenter Study. Clin Infect Dis 33:177–186. 10.1086/321811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pittet D, Monod M, Suter PM, Frenk E, Auckenthaler R (1994) Candida colonization and subsequent infections in critically III surgical patients. Ann Surg 220:751–758. 10.1097/00000658-199412000-00008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mayer FL, Wilson D, Hube B (2013) Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanisms. Virulence 4:119–128. 10.4161/viru.22913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Perlroth J, Choi B, Spellberg B (2007) Nosocomial fungal infections: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Med Mycol 45:321–346. 10.1080/13693780701218689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Spellberg B, Marr KA, Filler SG (2014) Candida: what should clinicians and scientists be talking about? In: Candida and candidiasis. ASM Press, Herndon, pp 1–8. 10.1128/9781555817176.ch1
  • 27.Lewis JH, Patel HR, Zimmerman HJ (2007) The spectrum of hepatic candidiasis. Hepatology 2:479S-487S. 10.1002/hep.1840020415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maksymiuk AW, Thongprasert S, Hopfer R, Luna M, Fainstein V, Bodey GP (1984) Systemic candidiasis in cancer patients. Am J Med 77:20–27 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Parker JC, McCloskey JJ, Lee RS (1981) Human cerebral candidosis—a postmortem evaluation of 19 patients. Hum Pathol 12:23–28. 10.1016/S0046-8177(81)80238-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sánchez-Portocarrero J, Pérez-Cecilia E, Corral O, Romero-Vivas J, Picazo JJ (2000) The central nervous system and infection by Candida species. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 37:169–179. 10.1016/S0732-8893(00)00140-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.de Oliveira CS, Colombo AL, Francisco EC, de Lima B, Gandra RF, de Carvalho MCP, de Maia Carrilho CMD, Petinelli R, Pelison M, Helbel C, Czelusniak G, Morales HMP, Perozin JS, Pinheiro RL, Cognialli R, Breda GL, Queiroz-Telles F (2021) Nical and epidemiological aspects of Candidemia in eight medical centers in the state of Parana, Brazil: Parana Candidemia Network. Braz J Infect Dis 25:101041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fricker-Hidalgo H et al (2001) Evaluation of Candida ID, a new chromogenic medium for fungal isolation and preliminary identification of some yeast species. J Clin Microbiol 39:1647–1649. 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1647-1649.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kitch TT, Jacobs MR, McGinnis MR, Appelbaum PC (1996) Ability of RapID Yeast Plus System to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours. J Clin Microbiol 34:1069–1071. 10.1128/jcm.34.5.1069-1071.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Slifkin M (2000) Tween 80 opacity test responses of various Candida species. J Clin Microbiol 38:4626–4628. 10.1128/JCM.38.12.4626-4628.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Garbee DD, Pierce SS, Manning J (2017) Opportunistic fungal infections in critical care units. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 29:67–79. 10.1016/j.cnc.2016.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.de Oliveira-Santos GC et al (2018) Candida infections and therapeutic strategies: mechanisms of action for traditional and alternative agents. Front Microbiol 9:1351. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rivero-Menendez O et al (2019) Clinical and laboratory development of echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata: molecular characterization. Front Microbiol 10:1585. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pristov KE, Ghannoum MA (2019) Resistance of Candida to azoles and echinocandins worldwide. Clin Microbiol Infect 25:792–798. 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.03.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fenn JP et al (1994) Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems. J Clin Microbiol 32:1184–1187. 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1184-1187.1994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dwivedi M, Muralidhar S, Saluja D (2020) Hibiscus sabdariffa extract inhibits adhesion, biofilm initiation and formation in Candidaalbicans. Indian J Microbiol 60:96–106. 10.1007/s12088-019-00835-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kim H-J, Brehm-Stecher BF (2015) Design and evaluation of peptide nucleic acid probes for specific identification of Candidaalbicans. J Clin Microbiol 53:511–521. 10.1128/JCM.02417-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Turhan O et al (2017) Evaluation of MALDI-TOF-MS for the Identification of Yeast Isolates Causing Bloodstream Infection. Clin Lab. 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.161101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fidler G, Leiter E, Kocsube S, Biro S, Paholcsek M (2018) Validation of a simplex PCR assay enabling reliable identification of clinically relevant Candida species. BMC Infect Dis 18:393. 10.1186/s12879-018-3283-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Berenguer J, Buck M, Witebsky F, Stock F, Pizzo PA, Walsh TJ (1993) Lysis—centrifugation blood cultures in the detection of tissue-proven invasive candidiasis disseminated versus single-organ infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 17:103–109. 10.1016/0732-8893(93)90020-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Carvalho A et al (2007) Multiplex PCR identification of eight clinically relevant Candida species. Med Mycol 45:619–627. 10.1080/13693780701501787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Katsyv A, Schoelmerich MC, Basen M, Müller V (2021) The pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase of the thermophilic acetogen, Thermoanaerobacter kivui. FEBS Open Bio 11:1332–1342. 10.1002/2211-5463.13136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Agarwal S, Manchanda V, Verma N, Bhalla P (2011) Yeast identification in routine clinical microbiology laboratory and its clinical relevance. Indian J Med Microbiol 29:172–177. 10.4103/0255-0857.81794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bayona JVM, García CS, Palop NT, Cardona CG (2020) Evaluation of a novel chromogenic medium for Candida spp. identification and comparison with CHROMagarTM Candida for the detection of Candida auris in surveillance samples. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 98:115168. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Monday LM, Acosta TP, Alangaden G (2021) T2Candida for the diagnosis and management of invasive Candida infections. J Fungi 7:178. 10.3390/jof7030178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Himmelreich U et al (2003) Rapid Identification of Candida species by using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and a statistical classification strategy. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4566–4574. 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4566-4574.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Martínez-Murcia A, Navarro A, Bru G, Chowdhary A, Hagen F, Meis JF (2018) Internal validation of GPS™ MONODOSE CanAur dtec-qPCR kit following the UNE/EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005 for detection of the emerging yeast Candida auris. Mycoses 61:877–884. 10.1111/myc.12834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.García-Salazar E et al (2022) Detection and molecular identification of eight candida species in clinical samples by simplex PCR. Microorganisms 10:374. 10.3390/microorganisms10020374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang J, Hung G-C, Nagamine K, Li B, Tsai S, Lo S-C (2016) Development of Candida -specific real-time PCR assays for the detection and identification of eight medically important Candida species. Microbiol Insights 9:MBI.S38517. 10.4137/MBI.S38517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cooper GR, Nettleton RW (1978) A spread-spectrum technique for high-capacity mobile communications. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 27:264–275. 10.1109/T-VT.1978.23758 [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Schmidt CM (2004) Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 139:718. 10.1001/archsurg.139.7.718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Alam MZ et al (2014) Candida identification: a journey from conventional to molecular methods in medical mycology. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30:1437–1451. 10.1007/s11274-013-1574-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mohanty SP, Kougianos E (2006) Biosensors: a tutorial review. IEEE Potentials 25:35–40. 10.1109/MP.2006.1649009 [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Organic thin-film transistors as transducers for (bio) analytical applications. https://link.springer.com/journal/216. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 59.Damborský P, Švitel J, Katrlík J (2016) Optical biosensors. Essays Biochem 60:91–100. 10.1042/EBC20150010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cooper RM et al (2014) A microdevice for rapid optical detection of magnetically captured rare blood pathogens. Lab Chip 14:182–188. 10.1039/C3LC50935D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sahin B, Kaya T (2019) Electrochemical amperometric biosensor applications of nanostructured metal oxides: a review. Mater Res Express 6:42003. 10.1088/2053-1591/aafa95 [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Reyna-Beltrán E, Méndez CIB, Iranzo M, Mormeneo S, Luna-Arias JP (2019) The cell wall of Candidaalbicans: a proteomics view. In: Candidaalbicans. IntechOpen. 10.5772/intechopen.82348
  • 63.Sendid B, Tabouret M, Poirot JL, Mathieu D, Fruit J, Poulain D (1999) New enzyme immunoassays for sensitive detection of circulating Candida albicans Mannan and antimannan antibodies: useful combined test for diagnosis of systemic candidiasis. J Clin Microbiol 37:1510–1517. 10.1128/JCM.37.5.1510-1517.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Villamizar RA, Maroto A, Rius FX (2009) Improved detection of Candidaalbicans with carbon nanotube field-effect transistors. Sens Actuators B Chem 136:451–457. 10.1016/j.snb.2008.10.013 [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Muramatsu H, Kajiwara K, Tamiya E, Karube I (1986) Piezoelectric immuno sensor for the detection of Candidaalbicans microbes. Anal Chim Acta 188:257–261. 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)86049-3 [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sá SR, Junior AGS, Lima-Neto RG, Andrade CAS, Oliveira MDL (2020) Lectin-based impedimetric biosensor for differentiation of pathogenic candida species. Talanta 220:121375. 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kwasny D, Tehrani S, Almeida C, Schjødt I, Dimaki M, Svendsen W (2018) Direct Detection of Candidaalbicans with a Membrane Based Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Sensor. Sensors 18:2214. 10.3390/s18072214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Yodmongkol S et al (2016) Application of surface plasmon resonance biosensor for the detection of Candidaalbicans. Jpn J Appl Phys 55:02BE03. 10.7567/JJAP.55.02BE03 [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pan Y-L, Yang T-S, Chang T-C, Chang H-C (2009) Rapid identification of Candidaalbicans based on Raman spectral biosensing technology. In: 2009 IEEE 3rd international conference on nano/molecular medicine and engineering. IEEE, pp 120–124. 10.1109/NANOMED.2009.5559104.
  • 70.Hassan RYA, El-Attar RO, Hassan HNA, Ahmed MA, Khaled E (2017) Carbon nanotube-based electrochemical biosensors for determination of Candidaalbicans’s quorum sensing molecule. Sens Actuators B Chem 244:565–570. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.01.028 [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Pla L et al (2021) Oligonucleotide-capped nanoporous anodic alumina biosensor as diagnostic tool for rapid and accurate detection of Candida auris in clinical samples. Emerg Microbes Infect 10:407–415. 10.1080/22221751.2020.1870411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Metzgar D et al (2013) Broad-spectrum biosensor capable of detecting and identifying diverse bacterial and candida species in blood. J Clin Microbiol 51:2670–2678. 10.1128/JCM.00966-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Demuyser L, Van Genechten W, Mizuno H, Colombo S, Van Dijck P (2018) Introducing fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based biosensors for the analysis of cAMP-PKA signalling in the fungal pathogen Candida glabrata. Cell Microbiol 20:e12863. 10.1111/cmi.12863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Katrlík J, Holazová A, Medovarská I, Seilerová I, Gemeiner P, Bystrický S (2022) SPR biosensor chip based on mannan isolated from Candida dubliniensis yeasts applied in immunization effectiveness testing. Sens Actuators B Chem 350:130883. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130883 [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Akyilmaz E, Dinçkaya E (2005) An amperometric microbial biosensor development based on Candida tropicalis yeast cells for sensitive determination of ethanol. Biosens Bioelectron 20:1263–1269. 10.1016/j.bios.2004.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wang Y et al (2021) Development and application of a multiple cross displacement amplification combined with nanoparticle-based lateral flow biosensor assay to detect Candida tropicalis. Front Microbiol. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.681488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Akyilmaz E, Guvenc C, Koylu H (2020) A novel mıcrobıal bıosensor system based on C. tropicalis yeast cells for selectıve determınatıon of L-Ascorbıc acid. Bioelectrochemistry 132:107420. 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2019.107420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Dedić J, Kesić A, Hodžić Z, Ibrišimović M, Hadžigrahić N, Mehmedinović NI (2020) Early detection of fungal pathogens in patients with immunodeficiency involving a novel biosensor technology. Int J Dev Res
  • 79.Cai Z, Luck LA, Punihaole D, Madura JD, Asher SA (2016) Photonic crystal protein hydrogel sensor materials enabled by conformationally induced volume phase transition. Chem Sci 7:4557–4562. 10.1039/C6SC00682E [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Asghar W, Sher M, Khan NS, Vyas JM, Demirci U (2019) Microfluidic Chip for Detection of Fungal Infections. ACS Omega 4:7474–7481. 10.1021/acsomega.9b00499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Wang Y et al (2016) Antimicrobial blue light inactivation of gram-negative pathogens in biofilms. In vitro and in vivo studies. J Infect Dis 213:1380–1387. 10.1093/infdis/jiw070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Freire F, Ferraresi C, Jorge AOC, Hamblin MR (2016) Photodynamic therapy of oral Candida infection in a mouse model. J Photochem Photobiol B 159:161–168. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.03.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sukhanova A et al (2002) Highly stable fluorescent nanocrystals as a novel class of labels for immunohistochemical analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Lab Invest 82:1259–1261. 10.1097/01.LAB.0000027837.13582.E8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Han M, Gao X, Su JZ, Nie S (2001) Quantum-dot-tagged microbeads for multiplexed optical coding of biomolecules. Nat Biotechnol 19:631–635. 10.1038/90228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Li Y, Schluesener HJ, Xu S (2010) Gold nanoparticle-based biosensors. Gold Bull 43:29–41. 10.1007/BF03214964 [Google Scholar]
  • 86.DeVisser A et al (2011) RETRACTED: Differential impact of diabetes and hypertension in the brain: Adverse effects in grey matter. Neurobiol Dis 44:161–173. 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Chatterjee S, Wen J, Chen A (2013) Electrochemical determination of methylglyoxal as a biomarker in humanplasma. Biosens Bioelectron 42:349–354. 10.1016/j.bios.2012.10.091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zamora-Gálvez A, Morales-Narváez E, Mayorga-Martinez CC, Merkoçi A (2017) Nanomaterials connected to antibodies and molecularly imprinted polymers as bio/receptors for bio/sensor applications. Appl Mater Today 9:387–401. 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.09.006 [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Singh KR, Nayak V, Sarkar T, Singh RP (2020) Cerium oxide nanoparticles: properties, biosynthesis and biomedical application. RSC Adv 10:27194–27214. 10.1039/D0RA04736H [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Chauhan N, Chawla S, Pundir CS, Jain U (2017) An electrochemical sensor for detection of neurotransmitter-acetylcholine using metal nanoparticles, 2D material and conducting polymer modified electrode. Biosens Bioelectron 89:377–383. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.06.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Costa MP, Andrade CAS, Montenegro RA, Melo FL, Oliveira MDL (2014) Self-assembled monolayers of mercaptobenzoic acid and magnetite nanoparticles as an efficient support for development of tuberculosis genosensor. J Colloid Interface Sci 433:141–148. 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Deusenbery C, Wang Y, Shukla A (2021) Recent innovations in bacterial infection detection and treatment. ACS Infect Dis 7:695–720. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Long GL, Winefordner JD (1983) Limit of detection. A closer look at the IUPAC definition. Anal Chem 55:712A-724A. 10.1021/ac00258a001 [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Sheybani R, Shukla A (2017) Highly sensitive label-free dual sensor array for rapid detection of wound bacteria. Biosens Bioelectron 92:425–433. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.10.084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wang J, Liu G, Jan MR (2004) Ultrasensitive electrical biosensing of proteins and DNA: carbon-nanotube derived amplification of the recognition and transduction events. J Am Chem Soc 126:3010–3011. 10.1021/ja031723w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Huang G-W, Xiao H-M, Fu S-Y (2015) Wearable electronics of silver-nanowire/poly(dimethylsiloxane) nanocomposite for smart clothing. Sci Rep 5:13971. 10.1038/srep13971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Brolo AG (2012) Plasmonics for future biosensors. Nat Photonics 6:709–713. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.266 [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Ambhorkar P et al (2018) Nanowire-based biosensors: from growth to applications. Micromachines (Basel) 9:679. 10.3390/mi9120679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kim W et al (2018) A label-free cellulose SERS biosensor chip with improvement of nanoparticle-enhanced LSPR effects for early diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage-induced complications. Biosens Bioelectron 111:59–65. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Nooranian S, Mohammadinejad A, Mohajeri T, Aleyaghoob G, Kazemi-Oskuee R (2022) Biosensors based on aptamer-conjugated gold nanoparticles: a review. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 69:1517–1534. 10.1002/bab.2224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Fei J, Dou W, Zhao G (2015) A sandwich electrochemical immunosensor for Salmonella pullorum and Salmonella gallinarum based on a screen-printed carbon electrode modified with an ionic liquid and electrodeposited gold nanoparticles. Microchim Acta 182:2267–2275. 10.1007/s00604-015-1573-x [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Razmi N, Hasanzadeh M, Willander M, Nur O (2020) Recent progress on the electrochemical biosensing of Escherichia coli O157:H7: material and methods overview. Biosensors (Basel) 10:54. 10.3390/bios10050054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Gaba S, Jain U (2024) Advanced biosensors for nanomaterial-based detection of transforming growth factor alpha and beta, a class of major polypeptide regulators. Int J Biol Macromol 257:128622. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Gaba S, Chauhan N, Chandra R, Jain U (2024) Future advances of artificial biosensor technology in biomedical applications. Talanta Open. 10.1016/j.talo.2024.100301 [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Balayan S, Chauhan N, Chandra R, Jain U (2022) Molecular imprinting based electrochemical biosensor for identification of serum amyloid A (SAA), a neonatal sepsis biomarker. Int J Biol Macromol 195:589–597. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.12.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES