Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):6615–6625. doi: 10.62347/DTPQ4790

Table 2.

Comparison of CT imaging features between the two groups

Image feature Benign group (n = 102) Malignant group (n = 98) χ2/Z p
Diameter 0.869 0.648
    0-10 mm 21 (20.59%) 20 (20.14%)
    11-20 mm 45 (44.12%) 49 (50.00%)
    21-30 mm 36 (35.29%) 29 (29.86%)
Shape 0.905 0.341
    Circle/quasi-circle 72 (70.59%) 63 (64.29%)
    Irregularity 30 (29.41%) 35 (35.71%)
Position 3.504 0.061
    Superior lobe 49 (48.04%) 60 (61.22%)
    Other leaf 53 (51.96%) 38 (38.78%)
Lobulation 22 (21.57%) 77 (78.57%) 64.967 0.000
Burr sign 15 (14.71%) 60 (61.22%) 46.146 0.000
Pleural indentation 5 (4.90%) 37 (37.76%) 32.516 0.000
Calcification 40 (39.22%) 8 (8.16%) 26.422 0.000
Bronchial amputation sign 15 (14.71%) 14 (14.29%) 0.007 0.933
Boundary 0.028 0.867
    Clear 93 (91.18%) 90 (91.84%)
    Blur 9 (8.82%) 8 (8.16%)
Cavity sign 15 (14.71%) 17 (17.35%) 0.259 0.611
Vascular cluster sign 5 (4.90%) 47 (48.00%) 48.160 0.000
Nodule density 46.162 0.000
    Solid nodule 93 (91.18%) 46 (46.94%)
    Mix ground glass nodules 5 (4.90%) 27 (27.55%)
    Pure ground glass nodules 4 (3.92%) 25 (25.51%)