Table 1.
Literature review
| Case | Age/Gender | Indication for ECMO | ECMO | Treatment | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gurkirat Kohli et al. 2023 [5] | 55/male | Cardiogenic shock | V-A ECMO | Internal carotid artery stent thrombectomy | Survival |
| Gurkirat Kohli et al. 2023 | 48/male | Cardiogenic shock | V-A ECMO | Internal carotid artery stent thrombectomy | Survival |
| Gurkirat Kohli et al. 2023 | 17/female | Cardiogenic shock | V-A ECMO | Basilar artery thrombus | Survival |
| Shan L et al. 2024 [6] | 81/female | Cardiogenic shock | V-A ECMO | Intracranial revascularization | Die |
| Loic Le Guennec et al. 2023 [7] | NA | Cardiogenic shock | V-A ECMO | Internal carotid artery stent thrombectomy | Survival |
| Loic Le Guennec et al. 2023 | NA | Cardiogenic shock | V-A ECMO | Internal carotid artery stent thrombectomy | Survival |
| Ali Sultan-Qurraie et al. 2023 [8] | 53/male | Cardiogenic shock | V-A ECMO | Basilar artery thrombus | Survival |