Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 13:24741264241305105. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1177/24741264241305105

Table 3.

Comparison of Outcomes Between the 2 Groups. a

Characteristic Group 1 Group 2 P Value
(n = 52) (n = 22)
Mean logMAR BCVA ± SD
 POD 15 1.1 ± 0.5 0.8 ± 0.5 .004
 POD 90 0.9 ± 0.5 0.7 ± 0.5 .002
 Final follow-up 0.8 ± 0.5 0.7 ± 0.5 .0006
Mean BCVA improvement vs baseline ± SD
 POD 15 0.6 ± 0.6 0.2 ± 0.2 .004
 POD 90 0.8 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.3 .002
 Final follow-up 0.8 ± 0.6 0.3 ± 0.2 .0005
Mean IOP (mm Hg) ± SD
 POD 15 21.0 ± 8.9 18.4 ± 5.3 .064
 Final follow-up 20.2 ± 7.7 16.5 ± 4.3 .006
IOP ≥21 mm Hg b at final follow-up, n (%) 5  (9.6) 4 (18.2) .303
Snellen BCVA better than 6/60, n (%) 26 (50.0) 12 (54.5) .721
Silicone oil removal, n (%) .546
 Yes 39 (75.0) 15 (68.2)
 Not until last follow-up/recurrent RD 13 (25.0) 7 (31.8)
Final retina status, n (%) .33
 Macula-on 43 (82.69) 16 (72.72)
 Recurrent RD, macula-on 2 (3.84) 2 (9.10)
 Recurrent RD, macula-off 7 (13.46) 4 (18.18)

Abbreviations: BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; IOP, intraocular pressure; POD, postoperative day; RD, retinal detachment.

a

Group 1 patients received short-term tamponade with perfluoro-N-octane. Group 2 patients received tamponade with silicone oil.

b

With or without antiglaucoma medication.