Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 11;13(17):e034783. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034783

Table 5.

Heart Failure, Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy, and Mechanical Thrombectomy

Reference Study type Total No. of patients Age, y Patients treated with MT, n (%) Patients with mRS score 0–2 at 90 d, n (%) Patients with mRS score of 6 at 90 d, n (%) Patients with sICH, n (%) Patients with successful recanalization (mTICI 2b–3), n (%) Summary of study findings
Schnieder et al 2019 99 Observational study on prospective single‐center stroke registry 373 Patients with AIS, of whom 90 (24%) with HF

No HF: median, 73 (IQR: 63–83)

HF: median, 77 (IQR: 70–84)*

373 (100.0)

No HF: 105 (48.2)

HF: 32 (43.8)

No HF: 17 (7.4)

HF: 9 (11)

No HF: 2 (1)

HF: 3 (4.4)

No HF: 175 (76.4)

HF: 63 (75.9)

No significant differences in study outcomes between patients with vs without HF
Gentile et al 2023 101 Observational study on multicenter registry 8924 Patients with AIS, of whom 642 (7.2%) with HF

No HF: median, 73.8 (IQR: 62.9–80.8)

HF: median, 77.1 (IQR: 68.2–82.8)*

8924 (100.0)

No HF: 3992 (48.2)

HF: 234 (36.4)*

No HF: 1530 (18.5)

HF: 197 (30.7)*

No HF: 648 (8.3)

HF: 45 (7.6)

No HF: 6398 (78.1)

HF: 488 (76.9)

Worse 90‐d functional outcomes and higher mortality rates than patients with vs without HF
Siedler et al 2019 102 Observational study on single‐center registry 1209 Patients with AIS, of whom 378 (31.3%) with HF

No HF: mean, 69.9 (±SD: 13.5)

HF: mean, 76.1 (±SD: 12.1)*

No HF: 155 (18)

HF: 88 (24)

No HF: 51%

HF: 35%*

No HF: 9%

HF: 20%*

No HF: 3%

HF: 7%

No HF: 87%

HF: 92%

Patients with HF had worse 90‐d functional outcomes and higher mortality rates than patients with vs without HF (also in the matched cohort)
Tan et al 2021 103 Retrospective study on 6 international stroke registries 440 Patients with AIS, of whom 101 (23.0%) with HF

No HF: mean, 67.0 (±SD: 13.2)

HF: mean, 63.5 (±SD: 13.8)*

440 (100.0)

No HF: 161 (48.1)

HF: 32 (32.0)*

No HF: 19 (5.7)

HF: 21 (21.0)*

No HF: 35 (10.0)

HF: 15 (15.0)

No HF: 289 (85.3)

HF: 87 (87.0)

Worse 90‐d functional outcomes and higher mortality rates than patients with vs without HF
Pana et al 2021 104 Observational study on publicly available national stroke registry 33 173 Patients with AIS undergoing EVT, of whom 2376 (7.2%) with HF, 4390 (13.2%) with HF and AF, and 10 826 (32.6%) with AF

No HF/AF: median, 61 (IQR: 51–72)

AF: median, 76 (IQR: 67–82)

HF: median, 67 (IQR: 56–77)

HF+AF: median, 77 (IQR: 66–83)*

33 173 (100.0) NA NA NA

No HF/AF: 3939 (25.3)

AF: 3093 (28.6)

HF: 596 (25.1)

HF+AF: 1268 (28.9)

No difference in reperfusion rates in patients with vs without HF
Y‐Hassan et al 2019 106 Case report 1 67 1 (100.0) 1 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (100.0) MT with TCM is effective and safe
Riva et al 2021 107 Case report 1 78 1 (100.0) 1 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (100.0) MT with TCM is effective and safe
Yamasaki et al 2021 108 Case report 1 73 1 (100.0) 1 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (100.0) MT with TCM is effective and safe
Nagendra et al 2023 109 Case report 1 67 1 (100.0) 1 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (100.0) MT with TCM is effective and safe

AF indicates atrial fibrillation; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; HF, heart failure; EVT, endovascular treatment; IQR, interquartile range; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; MT, mechanical thrombectomy; mTICI, modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia; NA, not available; sICH, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage; TCM, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.

*

Significantly different at P<0.05.