Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 28;110:105462. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105462

Table 2.

Cosinor-based rhythmometry analysis of circadian genes.

Mesor (relative expression)
Amplitude (relative expression)
Acrophase (hours)
Percentage of rhythmic subjects
Controls Active CS CS in remission Controls Active CS CS in remission Controls CS in remission Controls Active CS CS in remission
ARNTL 1.35 (0.81–1.50) 1.71 (1.30–3.04)∗∗ 0.99 (0.60–0.99)°° 0.55 (0.28–0.75) 0.33 (0.22–0.63) 0.34 (0.21–0.49) 01:03 (22:27–04:47) 00:22 (20:54–01:03) 36% 41% 38%
CLOCK 1.46 (1.19–1.69) 1.37 (0.89–1.68) 0.95 (0.63–1.12)## 0.54 (0.36–0.65) 0.21 (0.15–0.30) 0.45 (0.32–0.55) 01:00 (20:49–02:46) 00:55 (19:40–01:54) 46% 33% 12%
PER1 0.34 (0.24–0.49) 0.16 (0.11–0.70) 0.66 (0.51–0.77)## 0.22 (0.18–0.29) 0.11 (0.05–0.20)∗ 0.34 (0.22–0.50)° 03:18 (21:35–05:01) 19:55 (19:06–21:50) 73% 30% 88%
PER2 0.50 (0.32–0.66) 0.69 (0.47–0.99) 0.67 (0.57–0.77) 0.32 (0.19–0.46) 0.15 (0.09–0.21)∗∗ 0.30 (0.25–0.34)°° 02:39 (20:51–04:10) 22:21 (21:08–00:17) 55% 30% 75%
PER3 0.49 (0.28–0.70) 0.21 (0.12–0.47)∗ 0.87 (0.69–0.16)°°;# 0.28 (0.21–0.42) 0.17 (0.06–0.27)∗ 0.38 (0.35–0.47)°° 22:05 (19:49–00:20) 21:27 (20:15–23:22) 82% 41% 75%
PRF1 1.15 (0.91–1.46) 1.58 (1.08–1.58)∗ 1.29 (1.07–1.58) 0.42 (0.25–2.45) 0.29 (0.13–0.42) 0.44 (0.27–0.58) 21:47 (19:40–00:02) 23:06 (21:24–01:33) 73% 26% 88%
TIMELESS 0.89 (0.75–1.23) 1.13 (0.85–1.55) 1.25 (0.93–1.45) 0.42 (0.2–0.67) 0.18 (0.10–0.32)∗∗ 0.44 (0.40–0.63)°° 22:57 (20:59–01:21) 22:05 (19:25–01:10) 77% 30% 63%

Results of cosinor-based rhythmometry analysis on the time-course relative expression of circadian genes and percentage of subjects with circadian rhythmicity. Results are expressed as median (25th—75th percentiles). ∗: active CS vs. Controls; °: CS in remission vs. active CS; #: CS in remission vs. controls. ∗,°,#p < 0.05; ∗∗,°°,##p < 0.010; ∗∗∗,°°°,###p < 0.001 (Mann–Whitney test).