Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 15;11(24):2200690. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202200690

Table 3.

Clinical studies using patient‐derived organoids for in vitro cell sensitivity drug screening guided therapy (Abbreviations: No, number; GFR, growth‐factor reduced; S, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value)

Cancer type No. of patients No. of drugs Culture format Bioink/scaffold No. of cells per volume of bioink Success rate of in vitro expansion Concordance with clinical response Ref
Uterine carcinosarcoma, endometrial adenocarcinoma & colorectal cancer 4 ≈160 drugs for 2D culture. Top hits for 3D culture Cells embedded in the bioink GFR‐ Matrigel 1000–3000 cells per 10 µL bioink 38.6 % Yes [124]
Pediatric cancers 17 111 2D culture, spheroids None (scaffold‐free) 1000–4000 cells per well 50 % Yes (4/5 patients, predictive value 80 %) [126]
Colorectal and gastroesophageal 71 55 Cells embedded in the bioink GFR‐ Matrigel 4500–6000 cells in 30 µL bioink 71 % Yes (S 100 %, Sp 93 %, PPV 88 %, and NPV 100 %) [135]
Rectal cancer 80 Irradiation and 2 drugs Cells embedded in the bioink Matrigel 200 ± 50 organoids in 15 µL bioink 85 % Yes (Sp 92 %, S 79 %, Accuracy 84 %) [139]
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 138 26 Cells embedded in the bioink Matrigel 500 cells in 20 µL bioink 75 % Yes, with drug‐specific exceptions [138]