Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 2;102:skae365. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae365

Table 3.

Effects of zinc1 supplementation within non-steroidal implanted and steroidal implanted2 beef steers on carcass characteristics

NoIMP TE200 Contrasts3
Zn0 Zn30 Zn100 Zn150 Zn0 Zn30 Zn100 Zn150 SEM L-NoIMP Q-NoIMP L-
TE200
Q-
TE200
NoIMP vs. TE200
Steer (n)4 17 15 16 16 15 16 16 16
Hot carcass weight, kg 370 369 373 369 376 377 380 381 2.5 0.80 0.39 0.09 0.98 <0.0001
Dress, % 62.2 62.0 61.9 62.0 62.3 62.1 62.4 63.2 0.30 0.62 0.65 0.01 0.13 0.02
Ribeye area, cm2 84.4 81.7 86.5 83.1 89.4 88.8 87.9 87.6 1.96 0.76 0.56 0.48 0.91 0.001
12thrib fat, cm 1.61 1.67 1.43 1.69 1.50 1.44 1.52 1.56 0.086 0.87 0.09 0.43 0.67 0.12
Marbling5 491 470 483 495 472 460 452 472 22.0 0.70 0.52 0.96 0.43 0.17
Yield grade6 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.5 0.08 0.87 0.09 0.43 0.67 0.12

1Zinc was supplemented to cattle at 0, 30, 100, or 150 mg Zn/kg DM from ZnSO4 (Zn0, Zn30, Zn100, or Zn150, respectively).

2Steroidal implant strategies included no steroidal implant (NoIMP) or a Component TE-200 (TE-200; 200 mg trenbolone acetate + 20 mg estradiol; Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN) on day 0.

3Contrast statements were formed to test for linear (L) and quadratic (Q) effects of Zn supplementation within non-steroidal implanted (L-NoIMP and Q-NoIMP) or steroidal implanted (L-TE200 or Q-TE200) steers. A separate contrast statement was formed to test for differences between non-steroidal implanted steers and all steroidal implanted steers (NoIMP vs. TE200).

4Intial body weight was utilized as a covariate for carcass characteristics.

5Marbling scores: slight = 300, small = 400, modest = 500, moderate = 600, slightly abundant = 700, moderately abundant = 800.

6Yield grade was assigned by personnel of the commercial abattoir.