Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 16.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2021 Feb 24;591(7848):105–110. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03284-x

Extended Data Fig. 3. Core and variable model validations.

Extended Data Fig. 3.

a,b, Model fits for reproducibility of Mδ contacts, with membrane contact areas a, below and b, above the log-normalized mean (after thresholding, Methods, Extended Data Fig. 2h). c,d, Reproducibility model fits of c, inter-cluster and d, intra-cluster Mδ contacts. e, Reproducibility model fits for complete Mδ, Cδ and Gδ datasets including membrane contact areas <35% (results qualitatively similar to restricted dataset model fit in Figure 2a; Methods: Generating reference graphs). f, Reproducibility model fits for Cδ excluding synaptic contacts scored in only 1 EM section (Methods). g, Reproducibility model fits for Cδ excluding synaptic contacts derived from non-reproducible post-synaptic partners of polyadic synapses (Methods). h,i, Reproducibility model fits for synaptic and gap junction contact datasets scored by h, White et al. (1986)5 and i, Witvliet et al. (2020)20 limited to our M4 contacts. M: membrane, C: chemical synapse and G: gap junction contacts. Black bars: empirical distributions used in this study. Gray bars: other empirical distributions5,20. Red bars: Model fits for the empirical distributions. All fractions of the total empirical counts (n).