Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 6;121(50):e2405605121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2405605121

Table 1.

Fixation probabilities for a single random mutant in graph occupied by individuals of the other type: The first column describes the graph type, and the second and third columns represent the fixation probability of a single cooperator and defector, respectively

ρCn ρDn ρCn⋈ρDn An=ρCnρDn limn→∞An Bn=ρCnρn limn→∞Bn
Complete graph 2−c1n c 2 << 2−c1n/c2 0 n2−c1n 0
Grid 2−c3n c 4 << 2−c3n/c4 0 n2−c3n 0
Star c5n−1 c6n−1 ≈ c5/c6 c5/c6 c 5 c 5
Ar c 7 2−c8n >> c72c8n ∞ c7n ∞

In the fourth column, we compare the two fixation probabilities where ⋈ is the comparison operator, which can be very small <<, comparable ≈, or very large >>. The fifth and sixth columns consider the ratio An of the two fixation probabilities and the respective large-population limit. The seventh and eighth columns consider the ratio Bn of the fixation probability of a cooperator to the fixation probability of a neutral mutant, denoted ρn, which is 1/n, and the respective large-population limit. In the table, c1, c2, ⋯, c8 denote constants that are independent of n. The table summarizes the following: (a) for complete graph and grid, the fixation probability of cooperators is exponentially small in n, whereas for defectors it is constant; (b) for star, the fixation probabilities are proportional to 1/n; and (c) for Ar the fixation probability of cooperators is constant, whereas for defectors it is exponentially small. The large-population limit of the desired comparison ratios vanishes for the complete graph and grid, is constant for the star, and goes to ∞ for Ar. Observe that only Ar yields that the desired ratio goes to ∞ in the large-population limit.