Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 4;121(50):e2416682121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2416682121

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

m-values describe how the compaction of A17G FF evolves along the folding trajectory. (A) Representative amide 15N CEST profiles from I43 and S56 in A17G FF (16.4 T; TEX = 400 ms; 2.5 °C) recorded with varying amounts of urea. Experimental data are shown with pink circles while the continuous brown line in each panel is calculated from the best-fit parameters. The vertical black, blue, green, and red lines correspond to the fitted ϖF, ϖI1, ϖI2, and ϖU values, respectively. (B) Variation of ΔGFI1, ΔGFI2, and ΔGFU as a function of urea concentration. The m-value for state K (mK) is obtained from the slope of the urea concentration dependence of ΔGFK=-RTlnpK/pF, with pK and pF obtained from the analysis of the amide 15N CEST profiles recorded at different urea concentrations, as illustrated in (A). (C) Variation of ΔGFTSI1F, ΔGFTSI2F, ΔGFTSI1I2, and ΔGFTSUI1 as a function of urea concentration, where ΔGFTSKJ is the free energy difference between TSKJ and the F state. The m-value for transition state TSKL (mTSKL) is obtained from the slope of the urea concentration dependence of ΔGFTSKL=-RTlnpK/pF-RTlnkKL/C, where pK, pF and kKL are derived from the analysis of 15N CEST profiles recorded as a function of urea concentration. The constant C is set to be 107 s−1 and does not affect the value of mTSKL. Best-fit four-state exchange parameters obtained at various urea concentrations are listed in SI Appendix, Table S4. (D) Urea m-values obtained from (B) and (C) at various points along the folding landscape of A17G FF. Ten structures (W11–K71) of the F state (WT FF), the I1 state (WT FF), and the I2 state (A17G FF) are shown. In the case of the I1 state, residues corresponding to the disordered H4 helix have been added for the purpose of illustration.