Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 4;602(24):6705–6727. doi: 10.1113/JP286437

Table 2.

Stress–length relation mean values for CTRL and HFSD mouse cardiomyocytes

  CTRL 2 Hz HFSD 2 Hz P
Systolic stress–SL relation slope ((mN/mm2)/µm) 6.54 ± 4.97 16.35 ± 15.09 0.087
Systolic stress–length relation slope ((mN/mm2)/%length) 0.013 ± 0.011 0.022 ± 0.011 0.022
Systolic: diastolic stress–SL relation ‘Frank–Starling gain index’ (ratio) 2.40 ± 1.06 2.77 ± 1.45 0.562
Systolic: diastolic stress–length relation (ratio) 1.62 ± 0.25 1.73 ± 0.50 0.471

Comparisons between two treatment groups performed using Student's unpaired t test (CTRL: N = 4–6 mice, n = 9–17 cells; HFSD: N = 2–6 mice, n = 7–19 cells). Data are presented as means ± standard deviation.