Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 11;11(5):521–527. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.10.004

Table 2.

Comparison of DCT, CTA time, neurology consultation to consent for IVT, CNT and DNT among the three groups.

Items Group A (n = 85) Group B1 (n = 78) Group B2 (n = 65) H P Pairwise comparison
Door-to-CTA time (DCT, min) 17 (13, 21) 13 (10, 17) 13 (10, 16.5) 23.61 <0.001 A>B1∗∗; A>B2∗∗
CTA time 14 (11, 17) 12 (10, 15) 9 (6, 12) 37.01 <0.001 A>B2∗∗; B1>B2∗∗
Neurology consultation to consent for IVT (min) 26 (18, 35) 19 (11.5, 28) 16 (9, 26) 23.11 <0.001 A>B1∗∗; A>B2∗∗
CTA-to-needle time (CNT, min) 27 (22, 35) 18 (13, 26.5) 18 (12, 25.5) 32.73 <0.001 A>B1∗∗; A>B2∗∗
Door-to-needle time (DNT, min) 46 (38, 58) 30 (24, 44) 31 (24, 41) 47.82 <0.001 A>B1∗∗; A>B2∗∗

Note: Data are Median (P25, P75). ∗∗P<0.001. CTA = computed tomographic angiography. IVT = intravenous thrombolytic.