Shao 2006.
Methods | Randomised clinical trial Sequence generation: unclear. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: adequate. Incomplete outcome data addressed: inadequate. Free of selective reporting: inadequate. Free of other bias: unclear. |
|
Participants | Country: China, Thailand, Taiwan.
Number randomised: 235
Post‐randomisation drop‐outs: 14 (6%) (see notes).
Mean age: 51.7 years.
Females: 38 (17.2%).
Major liver resections: not stated.
Cirrhotic livers: 235 (100%). Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to three groups. Group 1: rFVIIa 100 mcg/kg (n = 74). Group 2: rFVIIa 50 mcg/kg (n = 71). Group 3: control (n = 76). Further details of intervention: IV drug every 2 hours starting 10 minutes before incision (maximum 4 doses). Other details: Vascular occlusion: not stated. Method of parenchymal transection: not stated. Management of raw surface: not stated. Other co‐interventions to decrease blood loss: none reported. |
|
Outcomes | The outcome measures were mortality, transfusion requirements, peri‐operative morbidity, operating time, and blood loss. | |
Notes | 12 patients from all three groups (individual groups not stated) who did not undergo liver resection (n = 11) and who withdrew consent (n = 1) were excluded from analysis. The data of 2 patients in the placebo group were lost. Thus only 221 patients were included for analysis. Attempts to contact the authors in November 2008 were unsuccessful. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear risk | Unclear. |
Allocation concealment? | Unclear risk | Unclear. |
Blinding? All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Within 10 minutes before the first skin cut, a bolus dose of rFVIIa 50 or 100 g/kg or placebo was administered intravenously over the course of 2 minutes...." |
Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes | High risk | Comment: 14 patients were excluded post‐randomisation. This could be related to the treatment effect. |
Free of selective reporting? | High risk | Comment: Important outcomes such as liver failure were not reported. |
Free of baseline imbalance? | Unclear risk | Unclear. |
Free of early stopping bias? | Low risk | Comment: The trialists recruited the intended number of patients. |
Free of academic bias? | Low risk | Comment: There were no previously published trials of same comparisons by the author. |
Free of sponsor bias? | Unclear risk | Unclear. |