Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 29;14(12):8568–8585. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-584

Table 3. Performance comparison of the proposed MSRNet with other models in AD and NC classification based on inter-database cross-validation with the ADNI, AIBL, EDSD, and OASIS databases.

Method ACC (%) SEN (%) SPE (%) AUC (%)
AGNN 85.2 65.6 92.8 89.7
GAT 84.0 61.9 92.6 88.5
GraphSAGE 87.3 72.9 92.9 91.7
HGNN 77.5 35.8 93.9 72.7
Graph U-Net 77.7 29.5 96.5 71.1
ConvMixer 86.2 78.1 88.8 91.1
3D VGG-16 88.8 79.2 91.4 94.6
3DAN 88.3 73.1 94.2 91.7
Proposed MSRNet 90.6 82.0 93.6 93.9

AD, Alzheimer’s disease; NC, normal control; ACC, accuracy; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; AUC, area under the curve; MSRNet, multispatial information representation model; ADNI, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database; AIBL, Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle; EDSD, European DTI Study on Dementia database; OASIS, Open Access Series of Imaging Studies; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; AGNN, attention-based graph neural network; GAT, graph attention network; HGNN, hypergraph neural network; 3D VGG-16, 3D visual geometry group 16; 3DAN, 3D attention network.