Table 4. Comparison of LMCI and EMCI classification performance in the ADNI cohort between the proposed MSRNet and other methods.
Method | ACC (%) | SEN (%) | SPE (%) | AUC (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
AGNN | 67.2 | 84.5 | 42.1 | 75.2 |
GAT | 71.0 | 81.6 | 55.1 | 76.7 |
GraphSAGE | 68.9 | 75.1 | 59.8 | 73.1 |
HGNN | 65.9 | 85.7 | 36.9 | 73.0 |
Graph U-Net | 58.7 | 57.3 | 60.4 | 70.3 |
ConvMixer | 70.7 | 81.2 | 55.4 | 79.9 |
3D VGG-16 | 77.2 | 82.6 | 69.2 | 85.7 |
3DAN | 77.3 | 75.9 | 79.4 | 86.0 |
Proposed MSRNet | 79.8 | 80.4 | 78.8 | 87.1 |
LMCI, late mild cognitive impairment; EMCI, early mild cognitive impairment; ACC, accuracy; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; AUC, area under the curve; MSRNet, multispatial information representation model; ADNI, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database; AGNN, attention-based graph neural network; GAT, graph attention network; HGNN, hypergraph neural network; 3D VGG-16, 3D visual geometry group 16; 3DAN, 3D attention network.