Table 5. Comparison of pMCI and sMCI classification performance in the ADNI cohort between the proposed MSRNet and other methods.
Method | ACC (%) | SEN (%) | SPE (%) | AUC (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
AGNN | 72.0 | 45.7 | 83.1 | 74.5 |
GAT | 70.2 | 46.1 | 80.3 | 73.8 |
GraphSAGE | 72.8 | 57.5 | 79.3 | 76.3 |
HGNN | 70.4 | 22.2 | 90.6 | 66.0 |
Graph U-Net | 70.5 | 23.0 | 90.2 | 65.3 |
ConvMixer | 69.3 | 50.7 | 77.1 | 73.7 |
3D VGG-16 | 72.1 | 63.1 | 75.8 | 78.4 |
3DAN | 72.5 | 62.4 | 76.7 | 77.6 |
Proposed MSRNet | 73.4 | 63.7 | 77.5 | 78.6 |
pMCI, progressive mild cognitive impairment; sMCI, stable mild cognitive impairment; ACC, accuracy; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; AUC, area under the curve; MSRNet, multispatial information representation model; ADNI, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database; AGNN, attention-based graph neural network; GAT, graph attention network; HGNN, hypergraph neural network; 3D VGG-16, 3D visual geometry group 16; 3DAN, 3D attention network.