Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 29;14(12):8568–8585. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-584

Table 5. Comparison of pMCI and sMCI classification performance in the ADNI cohort between the proposed MSRNet and other methods.

Method ACC (%) SEN (%) SPE (%) AUC (%)
AGNN 72.0 45.7 83.1 74.5
GAT 70.2 46.1 80.3 73.8
GraphSAGE 72.8 57.5 79.3 76.3
HGNN 70.4 22.2 90.6 66.0
Graph U-Net 70.5 23.0 90.2 65.3
ConvMixer 69.3 50.7 77.1 73.7
3D VGG-16 72.1 63.1 75.8 78.4
3DAN 72.5 62.4 76.7 77.6
Proposed MSRNet 73.4 63.7 77.5 78.6

pMCI, progressive mild cognitive impairment; sMCI, stable mild cognitive impairment; ACC, accuracy; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; AUC, area under the curve; MSRNet, multispatial information representation model; ADNI, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database; AGNN, attention-based graph neural network; GAT, graph attention network; HGNN, hypergraph neural network; 3D VGG-16, 3D visual geometry group 16; 3DAN, 3D attention network.