Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 11;14(12):8414–8428. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-650

Table 4. Comparison key measurements of aortic root between the DL method and 3mensio in the BAV subgroup (n=12).

Index (mm) DL method 3mensio Difference P value
LVOT
   Min D 21.3±3.0 21.4±2.5 −0.1±1.6 0.832
   Max D 29.1±3.4 29.4±3.1 −0.3±1.5 0.529
   pDD 25.6±2.9 26.2±2.7 −0.6±1.1 0.092
   aDD 24.9±2.9 25.2±2.5 −0.4 (−1.0, 0.3) 0.235
Annulus
   Min D 21.1±2.1 21.4±2.3 −0.4±0.7 0.071
   Max D 25.7 (25.1, 28.6) 26.8±1.9 −0.5 (−2.6, 1.7) 0.623
   pDD 23.3 (22.9, 26.3) 24.2±1.8 −0.2 (−2.0, 2.0) 0.751
   aDD 23.9±2.9 23.9±1.9 0.1±1.4 0.905
STJ, mean D 31.1±3.6 32.2±3.8 −1.2±0.8 <0.001
AAo, mean D 40.1±4.0 40.4±3.8 −0.3±0.4 0.034
Coronary ostium height
   Left 12.8 (11.3, 13.9) 14.7±3.7 −1.5 (−3.6, 0.7) 0.175
   Right 18.4±3.2 16.2±1.5 2.2±2.8 0.020

Data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed and as the median (25th, 75th percentiles) for nonnormally distributed variables. DL, deep-learning; BAV, bicuspid aortic valve; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; D, diameter; pDD, perimeter-derived diameter; aDD, area-derived diameter; STJ, sinotubular junction; AAo, ascending aorta.