Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 29;14(12):8942–8965. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1315

Table 8. Margin classification results.

Class code Method AUC (95% CI) ACC (95% CI) SN (95% CI) SP (95% CI) Phl P value (AUC, ACC, SN, SP)
Mar1 M1 0.7433 (0.71, 0.78) 0.6990 (0.65, 0.75) 0.6198 (0.54, 0.70) 0.7642 (0.69, 0.84) 0.26 0.04, 0.49,
0.65, 0.9
M2 0.7522 (0.72, 0.79) 0.7048 (0.65, 0.76) 0.6296 (0.54, 0.72) 0.7665 (0.69, 0.84) 0.51
Mar2 M1 0.9335 (0.92, 0.94) 0.8607 (0.83, 0.89) 0.8691 (0.83, 0.91) 0.8524 (0.81, 0.89) 0.12 0.1, 0.01, 0.15, 0.05
M2 0.9352 (0.92, 0.95) 0.8699 (0.84, 0.90) 0.8745 (0.83, 0.92) 0.8653 (0.82, 0.91) 0.61
Mar3 M1 0.8300 (0.81, 0.85) 0.7560 (0.72, 0.79) 0.7600 (0.69, 0.83) 0.7515 (0.69, 0.81) 0.31 0.0009, 0.001, 0.16, 0.0013
M2 0.8371 (0.82, 0.86) 0.7732 (0.73, 0.81) 0.7696 (0.71, 0.83) 0.7764 (0.71, 0.84) 0.39

M1: equal-weighted ensemble; M2: diversity-weighted ensemble. AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval; Phl, Hosmer-Lemeshow test statistic; ACC, accuracy; SN, sensitivity; SP, specificity.