Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 29;14(12):8974–8987. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1097

Table 2. Subgroup assessment of average score of image quality on silent MRA and TOF MRA.

Subgroup grading criteria Silent MRA TOF MRA P value
Total (n=85) 2.83±0.42 2.46±0.66 <0.001*
New hemorrhage
   + (n=22) 2.77±0.35 2.16±0.68 <0.001*
   – (n=63) 2.85±0.36 2.55±0.46 <0.001*
   P value 0.542 0.001*
Embolization
   + (n=35) 2.81±0.41 2.39±0.57 <0.001*
   – (n=50) 2.85±0.32 2.50±0.52 <0.001*
   P value 0.606 0.832
Nidus size
   <3 cm (n=26) 2.74±0.53 2.06±0.64 <0.001*
   3–6 cm (n=50) 2.92±0.21 2.65±0.37 <0.001*
   >6 cm (n=9) 2.85±0.34 2.37±0.56 0.021*
   P value 0.109 <0.001*
Compactness
   + (n=70) 2.86±0.35 2.50±0.51 <0. 001*
   – (n=15) 2.71±0.38 2.29±0.65 0.042*
   P value 0.714 0.037*

Data are presented as mean ± SD. *, statistical significance. MRA, magnetic resonance angiography; TOF MRA, time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography; SD, standard deviation.