Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 29;14(12):8785–8797. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-980

Table 3. Image quality assessment and subgroup analysis in the study population.

Parameters All patients (n=224) Arrhythmia group (n=53) Non-arrhythmia group (n=171)
SegBH RTCSCineFB P SegBH RTCSCineFB P SegBH RTCSCineFB P
Image quality score 4.37±0.92 4.10±0.59 <0.001 3.77±1.15 4.11±0.72 <0.001 4.55±0.75 4.10±0.55 <0.001
Image interpretability rate (score ≥3) 95.09 (213/224) 99.11 (222/224) 83.02 (44/53) 98.11 (52/53) 98.83 (169/171) 99.42 (170/171)
BMC 4.05±0.98 2.14±0.48 <0.001 3.99±1.15 2.21±0.60 <0.001 4.07±0.93 2.12±0.43 <0.001
Edge sharpness 0.530±0.223 0.335±0.151 <0.001 0.532±0.199 0.357±0.159 <0.001 0.529±0.231 0.327±0.147 <0.001

Results are shown as mean ± SD or % (number/total). SegBH, breath-hold segmented cine; RTCSCineFB, real-time compressed sensing cine with free breathing; BMC, blood-to-myocardial contrast; SD, standard deviation.