Table 1 |.
Study (year) | Diabetes mellitus type | Intensive glycaemic control target | HbA1c achieved (%)a | Microvascular outcomes | Macrovascular events | Mortality | Adverse events | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCCT (1993) | T1DM | HbA1c <6.05% | Mean 7.4 vs 9.1 | Sustained retinopathy: RRR 76% (95% CI 62–85%) Microalbuminuria >40 mg/24 h: RRR 34% (95% CI 2–56%) Neuropathy: RRR 69% (95% CI 24–87%) |
No significant difference | No significant difference | Hypoglycaemia: 62 per 100 patient-years (intensive) vs 19 per 100 patient-years (conventional) Weight gain: 33% (intensive) vs 9.3% (conventional) |
13 |
UKPDS (1998) (SU, basal insuLin)b | T2DM | FPG <110 mg/dl in the intensive arm vs FPG <270 mg/dlin the control arm | Median 7.0 vs 7.9 | Combined microvascular: RRR 25% (95% CI 7–40%) | No significant difference | No significant difference | Weight gain: 3.1 kg (95% CI −0.9 to 7 kg) | 22 |
UKPDS (1998) (metformin)b | T2DM | FPG <110 mg/dl in the intensive arm vs FPG <270 mg/dlin the control arm | Median 7.4 vs. 8.0 | AnyT2DM-re1ated end point: RRR 32% (95% CI 13–47%) Retinopathy: minimal slowing of progression, but not sustained |
Myocardial infarction: RRR 39% (P = 0.01) Composite macrovascular diseases: RRR 30% (95% CI 5–48%) |
Any T2DM-related death: RRR 42% (95% CI 9–63%) All-cause mortality: RRR 36% (95% CI 9–55%) |
96% increased risk of T2DM-re1ated death; 60% increased risk of mortality with early addition of metformin to sulfonylurea therapy | 23 |
ACCORD (2008) | T2DM | HbA1c <6.0% | Median 6.4 vs 7.5 | No significant difference | MACE: HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.78–1.04) Non-fatal MI: HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.62–0.92) Death from CV causes: HR 1.35 (95% CI 1.04–1.76) |
All-cause mortality: HR 1.22 (95% CI 1.01–1.46) | Increased risk of hypoglycaemia requiring any assistance (16.2% vs. 5.1%) Weight gain: 3.5 kg vs 0.4 kg |
25 |
ADVANCE (2008) | T2DM | HbA1c <6.5% | Mean 6.5 vs 7.3 | Major microvascular events: HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.77–0.97) Renal events: HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.66–0.93) No significant difference in neuropathy or retinopathy |
No significant difference | No significant difference | Hypoglycaemia: HR 1.86 (95% CI 1.42–2.4), although hypoglycaemia events were uncommon at 2.7% (intensive) and 1.5% (control) | 27 |
VADT (2009) | T2DM | Absolute HbA1c reduction of 1.5% | Median 6.9 vs. 8.4 | Any increase in albuminuria: 9.1% (intensive) vs. 13.8% (control) (P=0.01) | No significant difference | No significant difference | Any serious AE: 24.1% (intensive) vs 17.6% (control) (P=0.05) Hypoglycaemia significantly increased in the intensive group BMI 33.8 kg/m2 vs 32.3 kg/m2 (P = 0.01) |
31 |
This is a revised summary table; the full table is available as Supplementary Table 1. ACCORD, Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes; ADVANCE, Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation; AE, adverse event; BMI, body mass index; CV, cardiovascular; DCCT, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; HR, hazard ratio; MACE, major adverse cardiac event (defined as time to first major cardiovascular event: non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke or death from cardiovascular disease); MI, myocardial infarction; RRR, relative risk reduction; SU, sulfonylurea; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; UKPDS, UK Prospective Diabetes Study; VADT, Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial.
Intensive arm versus control arm.
UKPDS trial results are stratified according to whether the intensive intervention arm used sulfonylurea or basal insulin, or metformin.