Table 2.

Results from the evaluation e-questionnaire

Question	Type of question (Answer options)	N (% of respondents)a	Result
Reference documents
Relevance and usefulness of reference documents upstream from step 1	Unique choice question (Yes, No, No answer)	N = 16 (100%)	Yes: n = 16 (100%)
Step 1 (adapted NGT)
Added value of an adapted NGT for step 1	Visual analog scale (0-no added value, to 10-very high added value)	N = 16 (100%)	Med ± IQR: 8.5 ± 1.3 points
Added value of the presential modality for the adapted NGT (step 1)	Visual analog scale (0-no added value, to 10-very high added value)	N = 9 (100% of step 1 participant respondents)	Med ± IQR: 9.0 ± 2.0 points
Quality of step 1 meeting moderation during the feasibility test	Visual analog scale (0-very inadequate, to 10-very adequate)	N = 9 (100% of step 1 participant respondents)	Med ± IQR: 9.0 ± 2.0 points
Step 2 (e-questionnaire)
Adequacy of step 2 e-questionnaire content with regards to step 1 results	Visual analog scale (0-step 1 results not at all taken into account, to 10-step 1 results fully taken into account)	N = 9 (100% of step 1 participant respondents)	Med ± IQR: 9.0 ± 2.0 points
Step 3 (e-questionnaire)
Adequacy of step 3 e-questionnaire content with regards to step 2 results	Visual analog scale (0-step 2 results not at all taken into account, to 10-step 2 results fully taken into account)	N = 16 (100%)	Med ± IQR: 9.0 ± 1.0 points
Use of the individualized step 2 results report when completing step 3 e-questionnaire	Unique choice question (Yes, No, No answer)	N = 16 (100%)	Yes: n = 16 (100%)
General
Format adequacy (ease of use) of e-questionnaires	Visual analog scale (0-very inadequate, to 10-very adequate)	N = 16 (100%)	Med ± IQR: 9.0 ± 1.0 points

Med median, IQR interquartile range

^aE-questionnaire distributed to the 23 thematic experts having participated in the pilot phase of the fast-track Delphi process