Table 3.
The impact of ethnicity on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in Rh-negative pregnant women
| Outcomes | Han (n = 63) | Zhuang (n = 31) | Others (n = 6) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOHS | 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) | 3.0 (2.5, 4.0) | 4.0 (3.0, 4.0) | 0.321 |
| FD, n (%) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (6.5) | 1 (16.7)a | 0.025 |
| NH, n (%) | 22 (34.9) | 14 (45.2) | 3 (50.0) | 0.523 |
| PB, n (%) | 4 (6.3) | 2 (6.5) | 0 (0.0) | > 0.999 |
| LBW, n (%) | 5 (7.9) | 6 (19.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0.272 |
| NA, n (%) | 1 (1.6) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (16.7) | 0.113 |
NH Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, FD Fetal distress, LOHS Length of hospital stay, PB Premature birth, LBW Low birth weight, NA Neonatal asphyxia
aindicates a significant difference from the Han ethnic group, with a p-value less than 0.05. LOHS was evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis H test, while other comparisons were conducted using either the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test