Skip to main content
. 2005 Jul;16(7):3341–3352. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-03-0214

Table 2.

Classification of FRETR values

Row CFP- and YFP-labeled protein pair Line segment in proof FRETR mean SD Tukey-Kramer HSD levels FRET class
1 C:Spc42 and N:Spc29 0.98 0.09 1 None
2 N:Spc110 and C:Cnm67 0.99 0.07 1 Control None
3 C:Cnm67 and N:Spc29 0.99 0.10 1 None
4 N:Spc110 and C:Cmd1 1.01 0.11 1 Control None
5 C:Spc42 and N:Spc110 1.02 0.06 1, 2 Control None
6 N:Spc110 and C:Spc110 1.02 0.06 1 Control None
7 N:Spc110 and C:Spc29 1.03 0.07 1, 2 Control None
8 C:Cnm67 and C:Spc110 1.04 0.06 1, 2 None
9 N:Spc42 and N:Spc110 1.04 0.07 1, 2 Control None
10 C:Spc42 and C:Spc110 AF 1.07 0.09 1, 2, 3 Lowest
11 C:Cnm67 and C:Cmd1 BC 1.09 0.09 2, 3 Lowest
12 C:Spc42 and C:Cmd1 AC 1.10 0.08 2, 3 Lowest
13 C:Cnm67 and C:Spc29 BD 1.10 0.09 2, 3 Lowest
14 N:Spc42 and C:Cnm67 BE 1.13 0.08 3, 4 Lowest
15 C:Spc42 and C:Spc29 AD 1.17 0.12 4 Lowest
16 N:Spc42 and C:Spc42 AE 1.27 0.09 5 Low
17 C:Spc29 and C:Spc110 DF 1.37 0.12 6 Low
18 C:Spc29 and C:Cmd1 DC 1.69 0.15 7 Moderate
19 N:Spc29 and C:Cmd1 1.75 0.23 7 Moderate
20 N:Spc42 and C:Spc110 EF 2.02 0.25 8 High
21 C:Spc29 and N:Spc42 DE 2.05 0.25 8 High
22 C:Cmd1 and N:Spc42 CE 2.07 0.19 8 High
23 C:Cmd1 and C:Spc110 CF 2.15 0.30 9 High
24 C:Spc42 and C:Cnm67 AB 2.29 0.31 10 High
25 Spc110-YFP-CFP 2.42 0.22 11 Control High
26 Cnm67-YFP-CFP 2.65 0.18 12 Control High

The average of the reciprocal pairs in Table 1. The line segments for the geometric proof in Supplementary Materials represent the distances between the listed termini. For the Tukey-Kramer comparison of means, pairs not sharing the same level are significantly different at an alpha of 0.05.