Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 2;14(1):e240055. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0055

Table 3. . 24-month costs for the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty ‘status quo’ and Tack-supported strategies – non-severe dissection cohort, severe dissection cohort and entire dissection cohort.

Non-severe dissection cohort (A, B)   Status quo strategy Tack-supported strategy Difference
  Reimbursement/cost to payers Index $11,502 $14,398 $2896
Reintervention $3582 $984 -$2598
Total $15,084 $15,381 $297
  Device costs Index $842 $2787 $1945
Reintervention $556 $198 -$358
Total $1398 $2984 $1587
  Margin Index $10,660 $11,611 $951
Severe dissection cohort (C, D, E, F)   Status quo strategy Tack-supported strategy Difference
  Reimbursement/cost to payers Index $14,398 $14,398 $0
Reintervention $3369 $1767 -$1602
Total $17,766 $16,164 -$1602
  Device costs Index $2350 $2787 $436
Reintervention $807 $364 -$443
Total $3157 $3150 -$7
  Margin Index $12,047 $11,611 -$436
Entire dissection cohort (A, B, C, D, E, F)   Status quo strategy Tack-supported strategy Difference
  Reimbursement/cost to payers Index $13,520 $14,398 $877
Reintervention $3433 $1529 -$1904
Total $16,953 $15,927 -$1026
  Device costs Index $1893 $2787 $893
Reintervention $731 $313 -$417
Total $2624 $3100 $476
  Margin Index $11,627 $11,611 -$16

Results stratified into reimbursement/costs to payer, device costs, index procedure provider margins (defined as reimbursement minus device costs). Discounting and general population mortality applied.